[Gdal-dev] types common to raster/vector

[Ray Gardener]

> I don't think that a distinct namespace would really help
> anyone very much though, unless I am missing something.

It's more or less semantic, although namespaces are a logical means to 
uniquely group related types, and if one had a module using mostly those 
types, it could do a "using namespace... " directive and then not have 
to say the namespace every time, which would give a little more 
readability. I figure if one goes and refactors those routines into a 
third area, may as well be in for the pound after the penny.

Ray