[Gdal-dev] Motion: To approve RFC 6 - Geometry and Feature
style as OGR Special Fields
hobu at iastate.edu
Mon Nov 27 10:56:14 EST 2006
At 08:52 AM 11/27/2006, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>I'll vote +1.
>However, the fact that the special fields take precedence over other
>fields with the same names in the data file bugs me a little bit. I
>do not have a better suggestion to make, but at a minimum the
>special field names and this behavior should be well documented in a
>prominent place to avoid users getting caught by this magic.
>Perhaps ogrinfo could also be modified to detect this case and issue
>a warning if it finds those special fields in a dataset?
>Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>Motion: To approve RFC 6 - Geometry and Feature style as OGR Special Fields.
>>While I have not done a detailed review of the patch, I'm very pleased with
>>the new capability, and the approach taken. I will take responsibility for
>>some post-patch integration testing as well as writing script(s) for the test
>>I'm keen to get this in place with a few days to shake things out before the
>>first GDAL/OGR 1.4.0 Beta (circa December 1st).
>>I'll start voting with a "+1".
>Gdal-dev mailing list
>Gdal-dev at lists.maptools.org
More information about the Gdal-dev