[gdal-dev] Motion: To adopt RFC 23.1: Unicode Support in OGR

[Tamas Szekeres]

+1

Tamas


2008/4/25 Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>:
> Andrey, PSC Members,
>
>  On further consideration I think expressing the recoding features via the
>  CPLString is not such a great idea since it is not externally accessable as
>  part of the C API, and it is getting us all bound up in particulars about
>  the CPLString.
>
>  I am withdrawing my initial version of RFC 23, and calling for a new vote
>  on a new form (RFC 23.1) replacing the CPLString recoding stuff with a
>  C API version.
>
>  We can choose to extend the CPLString with recoding options, or derive
>  subclasses of CPLString in the future without an RFC as long as it doesn't
>  affect existing implementation, and base it on the C API for the underlying
>  work.
>
>  Motion: To adopt RFC 23.1: Unicode Support in OGR
>
>   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc23_ogr_unicode
>
>  Starting the vote over again with a +1 from me.
>
>  Best regards,
>  --
>
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>  I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
>  light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>  and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  gdal-dev mailing list
>  gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>