[gdal-dev] MEM Driver under Vista 64?

[Craig Miller]

Even better.  Thanks for the explanation and for submitting a fix.

Craig


-----Original Message-----
From: gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Even Rouault
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:54 AM
To: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] MEM Driver under Vista 64?

Craig

In fact the true reason is that the Create() method begins by trying to 
destroy the dataset by calling the Delete() method on it. And that was new
to 
GDAL 1.5.0.

So when you do some_driver->Create("MEM:::"), the identify method of the MEM

driver detects that "MEM:::" prefix is handles by it. then it calls the 
Delete() method on it. But there's not pfnDelete() function for that driver,

so it goes on by trying to Open() it and then it fails...

Well, so now, the real fix is to (NULL-) implement the pfnDelete() method on

the MEM driver, so that it does ... nothing ;-)

Furthermore, it's safer because otherwise mem_driver->Create("foo.tif", ...)

would remove "foo.tif" on the filesystem. So the Delete() method for the MEM

driver must absolutely do nothing.

Fixed in trunk in r15232

Le Wednesday 27 August 2008 20:27:01 Craig Miller, vous avez écrit :
> Thanks Chris.   That did the trick.
>
> Perhaps a quick note could be added to the MEM driver doc page?
>
> Craig
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Eustace [mailto:Chris.Eustace at petrosys.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:43 PM
> To: Craig Miller
> Cc: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] MEM Driver under Vista 64?
>
> I had a near identical issue when upgrading from V1.4.x to V1.5.2.
>
> The code checks the name passed in as the "filename" to Create(). ONLY
> if it is of the form "MEM:::" will it then look for other expected
> parameters (including PIXELS, LINES and DATAPOINTER). Otherwise, the
> passed in filename is pretty much ignored.
>
> So, the actual answer is to rename "MEM:::" as anything else and you
> will be fine.
>
> Chris Eustace.
>
> Craig Miller wrote:
> > I am working with an in-house utility written a couple of years ago that
> > uses the MEM driver.  Recently, after upgrading to Vista64 the utility
> > stopped working.  As it was using an old version of GDAL, I decided to
>
> fetch
>
> > the source from the vault and recompile/link against GDAL 1.5.2.  I
> > didn't change any code, but the new utility is failing with "ERROR 1: 
> > Missing required field (one of PIXELS, LINES, or DATAPOINTER)"
> >
> > I'm assuming the problem is either incorrect source (old code), a 64 bit
> > issue, or a GDAL version issue.  Before I start modifying the code to
> > allocate memory and include a DATAPOINTER I thought I'd ask if there
were
> > any changes between GDAL 1.4 (Maybe older) GDAL 1.5.2 that might cause
>
> this
>
> > or if it is a well known Vista 64 problem?
> >
> > Here's the snippet of code that is fails on the poMemDriver->Create(.)
>
> line:
> > 	GDALDriver* poMemDriver;
> > 	CString format = "MEM";
> > 	CString filename = "MEM:::";
> >
> > 	poMemDriver = GetGDALDriverManager()->GetDriverByName(format);
> > 	if (poMemDriver == NULL)
> > 	{
> > 		cout << "\"MEM\" driver not supported." <<  endl;
> > 		return false;
> > 	}
> > 	m_poUtmRgbDataset = poMemDriver->Create( filename,
> > 		m_poSrcDataset->GetRasterXSize(),
> > 		m_poSrcDataset->GetRasterYSize(),
> > 		3,  // 3 Bands, Red, Green, and Blue
> > 		GDT_Byte,
> > 		NULL);
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1635 - Release Date: 8/26/2008
> 7:29 AM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev


_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1637 - Release Date: 8/27/2008
7:01 AM