[gdal-dev] ERDAS Imagine to ERMapper

nicholas.g.lawrence at mainroads.qld.gov.au nicholas.g.lawrence at mainroads.qld.gov.au
Mon Feb 18 17:51:45 EST 2008


> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a large (19 Gigabyte) erdas imagine file which I
> > > > want to bring into
> > > > > ERMapper.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have downloaded the minimalist windows executables from
> > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/DownloadingGdalBinaries
> > > > >
> > > > > I am running windows xp with 2 GB of RAM.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know I should use the gdal_translate command, but I am
> > > > unsure of the best
> > > > > output format.
> > > > >
> > > > > ecw won't work for the file size is too large.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought GTiff would work, but I can't force BIGTIFF=YES
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a plain old band-interleaved-by-line format
> > > > available?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > nick

> > > > Nick,

> > > > GDAL v1.5.0 has ERmapper's ERS/BIL format built-in.  You
> > > > could try that..

> > > > Brent Fraser

> > > Brent,

> > > I downloaded GDAL today, and according to the name of the
> > > zip file I do have v1.5

> > > But what is the short form of ERMapper's ERS/BIL format?
> > > I can not find it in the list of supported formats at
> > > http://www.gdal.org/formats_list.html

> > > Regards,
> > > nick

> > Me again.

> > I have found the short form for ERMapper's ERS/BIL format within
> > the help for gdal_translate itself.

> > I'm running the translate now. I'm guessing it will take hours
> > to complete.

> > Regards,
> > nick

> I should provide some background.

> I have an ERDAS Imagine file of 19 Gigabytes that I want to import
> into ERMapper. Two other files (next largest size is 16 Gigabytes)
> imported okay. I only have problems with the last image.

> The top half of the image is fine. The lower half is all black.

> My supplier can view the entire image at his end.

> I used ArcMap to open the image at my end and it is fine.

> This confirms that the file itself is okay.

> I downloaded GDAL v1.5 and used gdal_translate to go from
> ERDAS Imagine format to ERMapper format as I stated in my
> previous message.

> The processing has now finished, and the result is the same error
> of the lower half of the image being all black.

> So, GDAL is giving the same results for me as ERMapper does. But
> ArcMap displays it fine.

> Excuse me, I just thought of something.

> Okay, back again. I zoomed in with ArcMap, and after a while, the
> screen went all black. ERDAS Imagine has pyramid layers right? Is
> my problem that the pyramid layers are displaying fine but the
> lowest layer is bad? Is ArcMap initially displaying the pyramid
> layers whilst ERMapper and GDAL ignore the pyramid layers to
> access the raw data?

> Regards,
> nick

Problem solved.

The file was corrupt. I asked for it to be supplied a second time,
and the translation went fine.

Regards,
nick



***********************************************************************
WARNING: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain legally
privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was intended
to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way.  No one is 
allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print 
or copy this e-mail without appropriate authority.

If this e-mail was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
please telephone or e-mail me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of
this e-mail and delete it and any copies of it from your computer
system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and 
any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this e-mail is not 
waived or destroyed by that mistake.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this e-mail does not contain
and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by
third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with
your computer system).

Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads, Queensland
Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or endorsed organisations
utilising the same infrastructure.
***********************************************************************



More information about the gdal-dev mailing list