[gdal-dev] Re: Motion: Adopt RFC 20: OGRSpatialReference Axis Support

[Tamas Szekeres]

I'm +0 with these changes. I agree with the necessity of the changes,
but I couldn't think over all of the possible impacts by this time.

Best regards,

Tamas



2008/1/19, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>:
> Andrey Kiselev wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:54:36PM -0500, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> >>  The CPL config option "IGNORE_AXIS_ORIENTATION" may also be set to
> >>  "TRUE" to disable OGRCoordinateTransformation's checking, and
> >>  application of axis orientation changes. Effectively this is a
> >>  backdoor to disable the core effects of the RFC.
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > Do we have any convention on GDAL option naming? Some of them starts
> > with "GDAL_" prefix, but this one not. I am suggesting to rename it in
> > "GDAL_IGNORE_AXIS_ORIENTATION" to be more uniform and clear.
>
> Andrey,
>
> I have adjusted the RFC accordingly, though we haven't generally been
> very consistent with CPL config option naming in the past.
>
> Unfortunately our two business days (and a bit) have passed without
> getting enough support for the RFC to pass.  Under the assumption (hope!)
> that folks have just been to busy to review it, I'm going to keep the
> motion alive for an extra two business days (till Tuesday evening).
>
> Any PSC members who have concerns are encouraged to raise them.  If there
> isn't support by then, I guess I'll have to shelve this plan and see what
> alternative I can come up with.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>