[gdal-dev] Problem with gdal 1.8 -- segmentation fault on large image with gdaladdo

[Even Rouault]

Stephen,

I've just managed to reproduce your issue by creating a fake 60000x60000 3 
band tif and running gdaladdo on it. Investigating...

Le vendredi 31 décembre 2010 16:44:04, Stephen Mather a écrit :
> Hi All,
>     Testing out gdal 1.8; really excited by
> http://www.gdal.org/gdallocationinfo.html.  Below is a comparison of doing
> the same process in 1.7.3 and then 1.8dev, released 2010/01/19
> 
> $ gdaladdo --version
> GDAL 1.7.3, released 2010/11/10
> 
> $ gdalbuildvrt LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.vrt *.png
> 0...10...20...30...40...50...60...70...80...90...100 - done.
> 
> $ gdal_translate -b 1 LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.vrt
> LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.tif
> 
> Input file size is 60000, 60000
> 0...10...20...30...40...50...60...70...80...90...100 - done.
> 
> $ gdaladdo -r average LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.tif 2 4 8 16 32 64 128
> 256 512 1024
> 0...10...20...30...40...50...60...70...80...90...100 - done.
> 
> 
> sudo make install 1.8
> then:
> $ gdaladdo --version
> GDAL 1.8dev, released 2010/01/19
> 
> $ gdalbuildvrt LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.vrt *.png
> 0...10...20...30...40...50...60...70...80...90...100 - done.
> $ gdal_translate -b 1 LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.vrt
> LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.tif
> Input file size is 60000, 60000
> 0...10...20...30...40...50...60...70...80...90...100 - done.
> $ gdaladdo -r average LEAP_Tree_Height_low_res_test.tif 2 4 8 16 32 64 128
> 256 512 1024
> 0...10...20...30...40.Segmentation fault
> 
> I've compiled this with ./configure, make, sudo make install on a Mac
> 10.6.5 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo with 2GB memory.
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve