[gdal-dev] Motion: Approve RFC 33 - GeoTIFF - Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation

[Ari Jolma]

On 11/22/2010 10:50 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Howard Butler wrote:
>> As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's 
>> thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a 
>> number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory?
>> For example, instead of installing in /usr/local/include/gdal.h
>>
>> for GDAL 1.8, we'd install in
>> /usr/local/include/gdal18/gdal.h
>>
>> Do we need an RFC for this?
>
> Howard,
>
> I am in support of such a change.  I think a brief RFC might be in order.

I added that into my wishlist for GDAL 2.0 :)

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GDAL20Changes

but the sooner the better.

Ari

>
> Best regards,