[gdal-dev] Motion: Approve GDAL/OGR 1.10.1RC1 for release

[Even Rouault]

Le samedi 24 août 2013 19:57:47, Kurt Schwehr a écrit :
> LGTM with respect to fink package on mac osx 10.8
> 
> - Looks like I have a todo on jasper.
> - not sure on http_4
> - png.py and test_gdalwarp below.
> - rest are flagged as know issues or pre-release things

Hi Kurt,

Thanks for your testing. Comments below

> 
> -kurt
> 
> 
>  ------------ Failures ------------
> Script: ogr/ogr_shape.py
>   TEST: ogr_shape_68 ... fail
>     line 3249: fail

Yes, I observed that it fails on Travis too on the Mac. Not sure why being not 
in a position to debug on the Mac. Advanced stuff, not critical if it doesn't 
work

> Script: gcore/basic_test.py
>   TEST: basic_test_8 ... fail

Same, fails on Travis for unknown reason on the Mac. The test is likely a bit 
fragile.

>     line 161: fail
> Script: gcore/gdal_api_proxy.py
>   TEST: gdal_api_proxy_3 ... fail

Same, fails on Travis for unknown reason on the Mac. Advanced stuff, not 
critical if it doesn't work

> Script: gdrivers/gdalhttp.py
>   TEST: http_4 ... fail

Might be linked to a temporary unavailability of the remote resource. I 
somehow remember that it can fail sometimes, but I have never tested on the 
Mac, so it might not be just an interminent failure

Does "gdalinfo 
/vsicurl/ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/cantopo/250k_tif/MCR2010_01.tif" 
repeatedly fail ?

You can try adding "--debug CPL_CURL_VERBOSE YES" for more info.

> Script: gdrivers/jpeg2000.py
>   TEST: jpeg2000_8 ... fail
>     line 189: Jasper library would need patches

Yes, this is a defect in upstream jasper that most linux distro have patched. 
Applying Debian patches might help you fix that

> Script: gdrivers/png.py
>   TEST: png_1 ... fail
>     line 429: Checksum for band 1 in "test.png" is 6846, but expected
> 57921. TEST: png_2 ... fail
>     line 484: Failed to create test file using CreateCopy method.
> libpng: No IDATs written into file

Hum, this is new to me. Which libpng version do you use ?

> Script: utilities/test_gdalwarp.py
>   TEST: test_gdalwarp_33 ... fail

The test might be a bit fragile indeed. It might depend on the libjpeg version 
you are using. There's a tolerance at 37, and you have reached 40. Could 
likely be changed to 40.

>  ----------------------------------
> 
> Succeeded: 2608
> Failed:    8 (0 blew exceptions)
> Skipped:   723
> Expected fail:12
> Duration:  06m4.3s
> As GDAL_DOWNLOAD_TEST_DATA environment variable is not defined, 107 tests
> relying on data to downloaded from the Web have been skipped As
> GDAL_RUN_SLOW_TESTS environment variable is not defined, 22 "slow" tests
> have been skipped
> 
> 
> png.py:
> 
> python png.py
>   TEST: png_1 ... ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back
> ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y offset
> 29 ERROR 1: GetBlockRef failed at X block offset 0, Y block offset 29
> ERROR 3: Checksum value couldn't be computed due to I/O read error.
> 
> fail
>     line 429: Checksum for band 1 in "test.png" is 6846, but expected
> 57921. TEST: png_2 ... ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far
> back ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y
> offset 29 ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back
> ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y offset
> 30 ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back
> 
> 
> 
>   TEST: test_gdalwarp_32 ... success
>   TEST: test_gdalwarp_33 ... Diff at pixel (160, 0) : 7.000000
> Diff at pixel (161, 0) : 1.000000
> Diff at pixel (162, 0) : 6.000000
> Diff at pixel (165, 0) : 2.000000
> Diff at pixel (167, 0) : 8.000000
> Diff at pixel (169, 0) : 8.000000
> Diff at pixel (173, 0) : 4.000000
> Diff at pixel (174, 0) : 9.000000
> Diff at pixel (176, 0) : 9.000000
> Diff at pixel (189, 0) : 10.000000
> Diff at pixel (266, 0) : 13.000000
> Diff at pixel (284, 0) : 17.000000
> Diff at pixel (172, 1) : 22.000000
> Diff at pixel (265, 1) : 31.000000
> Diff at pixel (301, 6) : 32.000000
> Diff at pixel (388, 37) : 38.000000
> Diff at pixel (118, 319) : 40.000000
> Max diff : 40
> Number of diffs : 3683
> fail
>   TEST: test_gdalwarp_34 ... success
> 
> On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org> 
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > PSC members, please vote for the following motion after conducting your
> > own testing.
> > Non-PSC members please let us know if you discover problems.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Motion: The GDAL/OGR 1.10.1RC1 package is promoted as the
> > final GDAL/OGR 1.10.1 release.
> > 
> > +1 Even
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

-- 
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html