[gdal-dev] GDAL 1.11 release plan

[Tamas Szekeres]

That sounds good to me.

Best regards,

Tamas



2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>:

> Hi,
>
> GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think about
> the next
> release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are no major
> architectural changes (although there have been non trivial changes in RAT
> management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only impacts
> core &
> drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who have
> looked at
> the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in trunk). For
> the
> details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS :
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*)
> There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new features, but
> I'll
> end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering.
>
> I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If people have
> features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11, please
> speak
> up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next week, give
> it a
> week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or just try
> RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well documented in
> HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11.
>
> Any opinion about that plan ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Even
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140325/8990ecd9/attachment.html>