[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification

[Ivan Lucena]

Even,

I think that RFC 36 should be included in your list of 
related RFCs and should be reconsider for adoption since the unification
 would make the probing even more expensive.

Regards,

Ivan 

> From: even.rouault at mines-paris.org
> To: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:47:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
> 
> Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
> > 
> >   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
> > 
> 
> No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?
> Or should I move that forward ?
> But I'd prefer if such architectural changes could be a bit reviewed...
> 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Even
> 
> -- 
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140516/bc8f1214/attachment.html>