[gdal-dev] OpenFileGDB, feature classes in feature dataset

[Armin Burger]

Hi Even

Thanks a lot again! I added the fix to the current 1.11.2 version and 
afterwards everything was fine, all layers in the FGDB v9 were found.

Cheers
Armin


On 03/15/2015 04:08 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Armin,
>
> I've committed a fix in http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5875 that should
> hopefully fix your issue. There was a problem with the presence of non spatial
> tables that could cause later tables not to be listed. This wasn't specifically
> related to feature classes.
>
> Even
>
>> Hi Even
>>
>> thanks for the reply!
>>
>> The FGDB dataset where I discovered that has unfortunately some
>> commercial IPR restrictions, so I cannot share it (and it in addition
>> has some 800 MB...). I will try to create a test FGDB with a similar
>> internal structure, I have to check if I can create an FGDB v9 format
>> with recent ArcGIS versions.
>>
>> Armin
>>
>>
>> On 03/10/2015 06:48 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
>>> Selon Armin Burger <armin.burger at gmx.net>:
>>>
>>>> Dear all
>>>>
>>>> I have a question regarding the OpenFileGDB driver in 1.11.2 release. It
>>>> now lists also non-spatial tables as layers of an FGDB (as mentioned in
>>>> the changelog). But it seems to not list any more layers that are
>>>> "feature classes" under a parent "feature dataset" (that's how the
>>>> relation is displayed in ArcGIS). This is at least the case for FGDB's
>>>> in older v9 format. In GDAL version 1.11.0 these feature classes were
>>>> still listed as layers.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a bug or an intended behavior?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like an unfortunate side effect. could you open a ticket and attach
>> such a
>>> GDB or provide a link to it ?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Armin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>