[gdal-dev] GDAL versions Vs PROJ versions

Vincent Sarago vincent.sarago at gmail.com
Thu May 7 08:12:30 PDT 2020


> Help to improve them is always welcome (hint hint!)

:-) I’ll see what I can do. I know that if we start adding PROJ version docs people may also ask for GEOS and more other libs.

> I'd strongly advise using either 6.3.2 or 7.0.1 for best experience

Thanks Even this is really helpful, I was also wondering if PROJ 7 was supported by gdal >= 3 so I got my answer 



> Le 7 mai 2020 à 11:05, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> a écrit :
> 
> Vincent,
>  
> > My second question is then should we make the docs a bit more clear ?
>  
> Help to improve them is always welcome (hint hint!) but listing all min/max versions of dependencies of GDAL could be close to a full time job since you'd have to actually test building and at runtime...
>  
> Regarding PROJ specifically, GDAL 2.x is (was!) better used with PROJ 5.2 (in particular for consistency of the EPSG dictionaries between GDAL and PROJ), but could probably also work with later PROJ versions, although that is not tested by CI
>  
> The requirements for 3.1.0 are the same as 3.0 : PROJ >= 6. I'd strongly advise using either 6.3.2 or 7.0.1 for best experience
>  
> Even
>  
> -- 
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com <http://www.spatialys.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20200507/5458a633/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list