[gdal-dev] RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

[Paul Harwood]

I am not sure if I should be posting this here or on the bug - so I am
starting here.

The RFC does not mention (either positively or negatively) the SWIG
bindings.

Just for the avoidance of doubt :

- It should probably be made clear in the doc if the SWIG bindings are to
be included in the CMAKE build process, and

- I ask the question, in all innocence and without any prejudice on my
behalf or even idea of what the answer would be, since if there were to be
a better way of organising things then a major refactor of the build
process would be the correct time to implement it.

Paul

On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 12:49, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please find at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/4590 a RFC that
> proposes:
>
> - to develop a CMake build system, officially integrated in the source
> tree.
>
> - and remove the current GNU makefiles and nmake build systems, when the
> CMake build system has matured enough and reached feature parity.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Een
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20211004/24873125/attachment.html>