[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster

[Mateusz Loskot]

+1 Mateusz

p. s.  An alias wouldn't hurt, not a substantial change but could be
useful, could be just tossed in.



On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, 13:22 Even Rouault, <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I feel the discussion phase has finished. There were a few questions
> about the existing GDT_Byte unsigned 8-bit integer type, if it should be
> renamed/aliased/etc, but no obvious conclusion emerged from this, and
> I'd suggest we keep with the status-quo with GDT_Byte, and the RFC
> remains on just adding GDT_Int8 for signed 8-bit integer.
>
> Motion:
>
> Adopt RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster
> (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634)
>
> Starting with my +1,
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221114/83774ad0/attachment-0001.htm>