[gdal-dev] Call for discussion: RFC88: Use GoogleTest framework for C/C++ unit tests

Javier Jimenez Shaw j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Fri Nov 18 11:27:11 PST 2022


I am not in the PSC, but this RFC sounds very good. Thanks!

Now that the tests are going to change, maybe it is a good idea to apply
clang-format to them.
.___ ._ ..._ .. . ._.  .___ .. __ . _. . __..  ... .... ._ .__
Entre dos pensamientos racionales
hay infinitos pensamientos irracionales.



On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 20:28, Kurt Schwehr <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am +1 for this switch, but I'm definitely biased by working at Google.
> My thoughts:
>
> tut definitely gets the job done, but I found it a bit awkward too.  But I
> think the updates and the additional features of GoogleTest are probably
> worth it.  I especially like the distinction between ASSERT.* that
> immediately stops a test when it finds and issue and EXPECT that lets the
> test move forward until the end of that test so that I can see all of the
> results of EXPECTS.  The formerly separate "mock" capabilities are really
> handy too.
>
> I wrote a bunch of C++ GDAL tests using GoogleTests in the 2013-207 time
> frame (Even used a bit of that work as starters to the tests in PROJ, but
> he went way beyond what I had).  I have a lot of the tests in github, but
> they are written against very old versions of GDAL.  And, the GoogleTest
> ability to work with newer versions of C++ has gotten a lot stronger.
> C++17 wasn't even available when I wrote a lot of the test code.  We have
> been upgrading GDAL and improving the tests, so if there is interest, I can
> try to do some updates to the repo.  If any of the autotest2 code is used,
> the license should be switched from Apache 2.0 to the MIT style license mentioned
> here
> <https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/a394f9cb299b2c3c2159098483d1fece3a464fda/LICENSE.TXT#L15>
> .
>
> https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/tree/master/cpp
>
> -Kurt
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:42 AM Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As this is RFC season. I've prepared RFC88: Use GoogleTest framework for
>> C/C++ unit tests
>>
>> Text at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6720
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> The document proposes and describes conversion of the existing C/C++
>> autotest suite to use the `GoogleTest
>> framework <https://github.com/google/googletest>`__.
>>
>> GoogleTest is a popular and maintained framework for C/C++ test
>> writing, that is a better replacement for the `TUT framework
>> <https://github.com/mrzechonek/tut-framework>`__ that we use currently.
>>
>> Even
>>
>> --
>> http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221118/9bab2f99/attachment.htm>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list