[gdal-dev] Is the SOSI Norwegian driver still useful?

Nils Erik Jørgensen nilserik at online.no
Tue Nov 14 12:01:49 PST 2023


I think there are many users.

 

Nils Erik Jørgensen

 

Fra: gdal-dev <gdal-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> På vegne av nagyrobi_r--- via gdal-dev
Sendt: tirsdag 14. november 2023 20:54
Til: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>; Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
Emne: Re: [gdal-dev] Is the SOSI Norwegian driver still useful?

 

Hi all! 

 

I use SOSI gdal conversion. So in case you are wondering, there is at least one user. 

 

Kind regards, 

Robet Nagy 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_Internal_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000604&af_sub5=EmailSignature__Static_> 

 

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:41 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev

<gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> > wrote:

On 11/14/23 20:05, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote:
> Le 14/11/2023 à 19:48, Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev a écrit :
>> On 11/14/23 19:16, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote:
>>> ==> Are there users still using the existing OGR SOSI driver ?
>>
>> We don't have metrics for the OGR driver, but libfyba0 still has 513 
>> users in popcon.
>>
>>  https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=fyba
> 
> Looking in the same column in 
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=gdal shows that gdal-bin would 
> have only 520 users...  which seems highly suspiciously low compared to 
> the super specialized and low level libfyba.  I would bet that > 99% of 
> installations of libfyba0 are because libgdal links to it, which doesn't 
> mean that it is used for useful stuff (the other reverse dependency of 
> libfyba in Debian is sosi2osm, which according to 
> https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=sosi2osm, has only 3 users)

sosi2osm was removed from Debian during the bookworm development cycle.

The only rdep of fyba in Debian is gdal now.

Almost all installations of libfyba are due to it being a dependency of 
gdal, that's why it has 23911 installations but only 513 votes (regular 
users).

> What if people build a Docker image of GDAL from source and install its 
> dependencies with apt install libfyba-dev: will that trigger a hit in 
> popcorn?

popcon is opt-in, there are only ~230000 systems running popcon out of 
millions of Debian installations. Hence it's mostly usable to provide 
insight into relative popularity compared to other packages in Debian. 
Container images are unlikely to enable popcon, the Docker images don't 
even have it installed.

> I'm more interested in Norwegian flesh and bones users testifying about 
> their use or non-use of SOSI.

Me too, if there are none left we can also remove the fyba package from 
Debian.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
  GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1



_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



-- 
Denne e-postmeldingen er sjekket av AVG-antivirus.
www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20231114/8414e001/attachment.htm>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list