Yes, I'll do so in my final configuration.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Tamas<br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/2/28 Even Rouault <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:even.rouault@mines-paris.org">even.rouault@mines-paris.org</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Tamas,<br>
<br>
Yes, nitf_37 won't work against the stable branch.<br>
<br>
Generally speaking, I think you should only run the stable branch with its<br>
autotest in branches/1.6/autotest, and not trunk autotest, as there are new<br>
features and bug fixes that go only in trunk and whose testing against stable<br>
can easily crash. Of course, I could make some conditionnal testing on the<br>
GDAL version to skip that test, but I don't think it's really worse the<br>
effort as similar issues could appear elsewhere in that autotest suite. And<br>
even if you don't get crashes, you'll get lots of failed tests.<br>
<br>
Even<br>
<br>
Le Saturday 28 February 2009 20:09:12, vous avez écrit :<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> I've been running against the stable branch. Is this an issue?<br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Tamas<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2009/2/28 Even Rouault <<a href="mailto:even.rouault@mines-paris.org">even.rouault@mines-paris.org</a>><br>
><br>
> > Yes, exactly you need latest trunk to run this test.<br>
> ><br>
> > Le Saturday 28 February 2009 18:53:30 Frank Warmerdam, vous avez écrit :<br>
> > > I was seeing a somewhat similar effect with the latest nitf.py and<br>
> > > a week old FWTools build but when I refreshed from the latest<br>
> > > GDAL source the problem went away leading me to suspect that the<br>
> > > test is for a recent fix put in by Even. Are you confident you are<br>
> > > running the test with the latest source? Perhaps there was a short<br>
> > > overlap?<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>