Check out the recent builds from here:<br><a href="http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/">http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/</a><br><br>Those have been compiled with spatialite support.<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>Tamas<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/3/11 Brent Fraser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Tamas,<br>
<br>
I was afraid of that. I'm having trouble getting MS4W 3 Beta 10's OGR<br>
to read my SpatiaLite database. I suspect it's because SpatiaLite was<br>
not compiled in (I'm a SQLite newbie so I'm not sure); but there's no<br>
way to tell.<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<font color="#888888">Brent<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Brent,<br>
><br>
> It should be "SQLite" in both cases.<br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Tamas<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2010/3/11 Brent Fraser <<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>><br>
><br>
>> What would "ogrinfo --formats" show if GDAL was compiled with<br>
>> HAVE_SPATIALITE set?<br>
>> What would it show if only SQLite (and not SpatiaLite) was compiled in?<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks!<br>
>> Brent Fraser<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> gdal-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>