Thanks Martijn,<br><br>I missed the sentence "It can be
dropped, too" when I first read it.<br>I opened a ticket for this issue.<br><br><a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4611">http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4611</a><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Martijn van Exel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:m@rtijn.org">m@rtijn.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Chaitanya kumar CH <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chaitanya.ch@gmail.com" target="_blank">chaitanya.ch@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Martijn,<br><br>Thanks for the excellent error report.<br>I couldn't find any statement for or against the requirement for the public schema. Can you provide a reference to this?<br><br><br></blockquote></div><div><br>
It's in 5.7.3 of the PostgreSQL documentation: <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-schemas.html" target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-schemas.html</a><br>
<br>
'There is nothing special about the
public schema except that it exists by default. It can be
dropped, too.'<br><br></div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>-- <br>martijn van exel<br>geospatial omnivore<br>1109 1st ave #2<br>salt lake city, ut 84103<br>801-550-5815<br><a href="http://oegeo.wordpress.com" target="_blank">http://oegeo.wordpress.com</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Chaitanya kumar CH.<br><br>+91-9494447584<br>17.2416N 80.1426E<br>