<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On 2013-06-03, at 8:41 AM, Jorge Arévalo wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">I like the idea about append the ESRI definitions to the end of the EPSG main file. So, I guess than, in that situation, I should just replace the "ESRI" part in the string with "EPSG", right? <br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>I guess so, I haven't done it myself, but once the definitions are in the main epsg file you would normally just use EPSG: with the new number.</div><div><br></div><div>Someone else may have a better idea :)</div><div><br></div></body></html>