<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Even,<br><br>I think that RFC 36 should be included in your list of
related RFCs and should be reconsider for adoption since the unification
would make the probing even more expensive.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Ivan <br><br><div>> From: even.rouault@mines-paris.org<br>> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:47:32 +0200<br>> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification<br>> <br>> Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :<br>> > Hi,<br>> > <br>> > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"<br>> > <br>> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification<br>> > <br>> <br>> No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?<br>> Or should I move that forward ?<br>> But I'd prefer if such architectural changes could be a bit reviewed...<br>> <br>> > Best regards,<br>> > <br>> > Even<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Geospatial professional services<br>> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> gdal-dev mailing list<br>> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org<br>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev<br></div> </div></body>
</html>