<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Sean,</p>
<p>I saw them as business-as-usual enhancements not impacting the
software in fundamental ways. I'm not sure what I would put in a
RFC that is not in their commit message. Maybe I don't understand
what your concern is.</p>
<p>Even<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 24/03/2022 à 15:28, Sean Gillies a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOodmJpid+3qSNLkFOOwnzawLtSVOwvWEvqSnQE4sC9Eth8sUw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi all,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The intent and scope of the features developed in <a
href="https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5463"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5463</a>
and <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5390"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5390</a>
seem rather big and unclear to me. This seems to me to warrant
an RFC. Yes? No?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Sean Gillies</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.spatialys.com">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
</body>
</html>