<div dir="ltr">Yes please!  The friction from not having GDT_Int8 keeps coming up again and again.  It is extra rough on beginners who hit this case.<div><br></div><div>But I would like to hear any voices for not doing this incase there is something I haven't thought of.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 2:43 AM Even Rouault <<a href="mailto:even.rouault@spatialys.com">even.rouault@spatialys.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I've posted in <a href="https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634</a> a new RFC to add <br>
a new GDT_Int8 data type, for signed 8-bit integer data, to the <br>
GDALDataType enumeration, which cleans up the current support we already <br>
have for that data type.<br>
<br>
Even<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href="http://www.spatialys.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.spatialys.com</a><br>
My software is free, but my time generally not.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gdal-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>