[Ica-osgeo-labs] Urban Science - City Analytics - The Road Map Challenge

Sat Feb 28 02:45:12 PST 2015

Key to this is incentives to participation. I've worked a decade ago with
an Urban simulation modeling community and the challenge was that
contributions beyond their city (such as cross-city collaborations) was not
seen as something they should be doing.

There are examples of this though in some spaces, like Moodle or Sakai
development across universities, for example.

I'm focused on the grant getting side of what we are trying to do. From
that angle, what we will need is some letters of commitment. We also need
to focus on research and education needs rather than sell the creation of a
system -- which won't fly with NSF. (I realize this is just one avenue.
Perhaps we need to look, as a group, to some foundations. For instance city
analytics on public health? Disease vectors?

I hope these posts are helpful.

Cheers
CHarlie

On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) <
patrick.hogan at nasa.gov> wrote:

>  Howdy! USCA (Urban Science - City Analytics)
>
>
>
> I added a bunch of resource links to the website, we may not need them
> forever, but in designing a Road Map for us to build a CitySmart app, we
> need to be thinking big, as in every city on the planet.
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoForAll_UrbanScience_CityAnalytics
>
>
>
> Can you imagine if we really got this seed crystal in place?! The big idea
> being an open source project with talent from metropolitan areas around the
> world, collectively building **their** platform such that every other
> city can also tailor it to their needs.
>
>
>
> The logic in the value to all cities may be a no-brainer, but can we
> really get our ducks lined up enough and then quacking in harmony enough to
> do what needs to be done? It’s so tantalizing to consider. . .we must find
> a way! A world literally working together to actually help each other. Nah,
> we could never do that. . .or could we? ; -)
>
>
>
> -Patrick
>
> (650) 604-5656 (office)
>
> (650) 269-2788 (cell)
>
>
>
> *From:* Mueller, Thomas [mailto:Mueller at calu.edu]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 27, 2015 11:42 AM
> *To:* Charles Schweik; Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
> *Cc:* ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org; Varun Chandola (chandola at buffalo.edu);
> Gabor Remetey; Giuseppe Conti; Jim Miller; MELICK Brandt
> *Subject:* RE: [Ica-osgeo-labs] Urban Science - City Analytics - The Road
> Map Challenge
>
>
>
> Charlie
>
> Thanks for the email.  Yes, I intend to read the documents this weekend
> and hopefully will have some ideas on a research question, etc.
>
> As far as focal points, I like the climate change resilience part - under
> that section we could discuss the issue of mapping or managing rolling
> brown outs, etc.  Just an idea
>
> Tom
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [
> ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Charles Schweik [
> cschweik at pubpol.umass.edu]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 26, 2015 8:55 AM
> *To:* Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX)
> *Cc:* ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org; Varun Chandola (chandola at buffalo.edu);
> Gabor Remetey; Giuseppe Conti; Jim Miller; MELICK Brandt
> *Subject:* Re: [Ica-osgeo-labs] Urban Science - City Analytics - The Road
> Map Challenge
>
> Hi Patrick, Chris, colleagues:
>
>
>
> I'm working on a draft letter to one or more US NSF directorates to
> explore whether they would have interest in a full proposal to support an
> International Research Coordination Network on "Commons-based Peer
> Production for Urban Science and City Analytics". This email by Patrick
> provides a start to what the task of this RCN might be
>
>
>
> Questions:
>
>
>
> 1) Is the OGC smart cities framework [1] that Patrick pointed out
> something we can use as a "foundation" for this network (I haven't yet read
> it fully, but it looks very useful)? Is there one or more people on this
> list who were involved in the development of that framework?
>
>
>
> 2) Can we define some focal areas of Smart Cities we'd want to concentrate
> on? *Key application areas*? For instance, the management of cities and
> regions for climate resilience might be one? Or support for the deployment
> of environmental sensors (e.g., water pollution monitoring, flood
> monitoring, etc)?
>
>
>
> 3) NSF, of course, is often looking for key, basic science, research
> questions that need to be addresses. Can we perhaps on the wiki come up
> with a list of really key research questions? There is a Research Questions
> section that is blank right now on the wiki [2]
>
>
>
> 4) Does anyone know of efforts in the past to try and create a
> collaborative network like this that were unsuccessful and why? I recall
> years ago an effort to develop collection action in local government open
> source (not geo specific) that failed - I forget what it was called. But
> answering the question of "why do we need this network?" is key. I have a
> lot to say but would welcome points here (perhaps on the wiki? [2])
>
>
>
> Any reactions in response to the group or me individually are appreciated.
>
>
>
> Charlie
>
>
>
> [1]
> http://gisuser.com/2015/02/ogc-smart-cities-spatial-information-framework-white-paper-announced/
>
> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoForAll_UrbanScience_CityAnalytics
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Hogan, Patrick (ARC-PX) <
> patrick.hogan at nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> Dear OSGEO,
>
> Urban Science - City Analytics is going to take a lot of work.
> But I can't think of more fertile ground for engaging a world in a
> mutually beneficial enterprise with practical and positive results than
> this.
>
> How hard the climb will be a measure of how much we want to accomplish.
> If easy, then not much, or maybe we really are all pulling each other up.
>
> We need a groundswell for a world in mutually constructive dialogue,
> working in unison towards a common goal.
> This is something our planet dearly needs at this very precarious time in
> one species' very short history (~150k years, we're just babes).
> We are a species consuming resources at an unsustainable rate (a future in
> jeopardy),
> and polluting our biosphere (our life support system) as if we didn't need
> it.
>
> What Can We Do?
> I hope we can design/architect an OSGEO software solution that excites the
> world community.
> We need municipalities around the world engaged in a partnership with us
> and us with them.
> What can we do for them? The OGC Smart Cities SI Framework and others is a
> big-picture bird's-eye view:
>
> http://gisuser.com/2015/02/ogc-smart-cities-spatial-information-framework-white-paper-announced/
> And also these:
> http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/
> http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/us/en/smarter_cities/overview/
> There must be more of these, help us find them please!
>
> Some Recent History:
> When NASA took on the mantle of going to the Moon, there were several
> independent projects designing and testing their idea for a Moon-shot.
> From that group some projects were selected to go forward while others
> were mined for their gems to go into the remaining projects.
> This process continued until there was only one 'project,' Apollo. Apollo
> was not one program, but the cumulative result of several 'competing'
> projects.
>
> Our Task:
> We need to develop a road map, the requirements doc, for what this Urban
> Science - City Analytics (CitySmart) program looks like.
> The requirements doc will likely be based on information in the
> 'framework' documents above
> This road map needs to allows for some early successes so we can get
> buy-in from 'real' municipalities to work with us to keep value-added on
> target.
> Then we will need a cadre of software development teams (or individuals)
> providing their solution in response to the road map.
> As we collectively together evaluate these, some will be asked to mashup
> until in the end we have one OSGEO CitySmart app. This app will have an
> open API for the menu system, for drag-n-drop of functionalities, so that
> each city can tailor it for their use, and the world community can continue
> to optimize old functionalities and design new ones (proprietary or open
> source).
>
> Who Will Do This?
> Maybe we can ask an academic or other organization to provide us with the
> road map (specifications/requirements), such as these two:
> http://sustainablecities.aau.dk/
> https://rd-alliance.org/
> If anyone knows of an organization or university who would be interested
> in designing the road map for city management per the 'framework' document
> links above, please let me know.
>
> The Road Map Challenge (a proposal):
> Here is 'a' plan (not 'the' plan, this 'plan' will change depending on
> feedback from all of us).
> An OSGEO Challenge with a NASA crystal bull for the award, just like the
> Europa Challenge, http://eurochallenge.como.polimi.it/, and of course
> NASA T-shirts.
> We need YOU (whoever you are) to design the requirements doc for the Urban
> Science - City Analytics (CitySmart) program.
> We will rank these and the number one vote getter will get the crystal
> bull (after they mashup the best of what is in all of the road maps into
> theirs).
> We will ask the Region and Theme Chairs to do the voting.
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoForAll
> And if there are special needs for the cities in the respective Regions,
> we need to hear about those requirements.
>
> What Next?
> The next challenge, the OSGEO SmartCity Challenge, will be to build
> according to those requirements and put a smile on the face of every
> municipality! And something the whole world can be proud of together, while
> experiencing the benefits of living in a smarter city. The City of
> Springfield Oregon has already shown us the path,
> http://www.nsdinow.org/SDI_Now_02/Technical_Support.html. Are there
> others?
>
> -Patrick
>  (650) 604-5656 (office)
>  (650) 269-2788 (cell)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
> ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Charlie Schweik
>
> Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
>
> Dept of Environmental Conservation and Center for Public Policy and
> Administration
>
>
>
> Personal website: http://people.umass.edu/cschweik
>
> Publications: http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/
>
>
> Author, Internet Success: A Study of Open Source Software (MIT Press,
> 2012) - see http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
>
> A: http://five.sentenc.es
>

-- 
Charlie Schweik

Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Dept of Environmental Conservation and Center for Public Policy and
Administration

Personal website: http://people.umass.edu/cschweik
Publications: http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/

Author, Internet Success: A Study of Open Source Software (MIT Press, 2012)
- see http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545

--------------------------------------------
Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
A: http://five.sentenc.es
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geoforall/attachments/20150228/912d5f36/attachment.html>