[geomoose-psc] Google Geocoder

James Klassen klassen.js at gmail.com
Fri Jul 1 07:58:56 PDT 2016


It may be old school, but I didn't see any good alternatives mentioned
though.

1. Violate Google TOS

2. Cripple the Demo, but let people add it back.  Also, removes it from
regular testing.

3. Who needs geocoders anyway?  This might be OK for the parcel app users
because they probably already have better local data anyway.  But it
doesn't help anyone else.

Also, this means the 2.9.0 on OSGeo Live should be fixed.

On Jul 1, 2016 09:49, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:

> geocoder.us was useful but the momentum for geocoding TIGER files in
> Berkeley databases is not considered particularly modern.
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:48 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think an email saying we noticed it was down and offering to help
> maintain
> > it might be worthwhile.
> >
> > I guess my real question is if geocoder.us is still useful to the
> community
> > or has the world moved on to something else (OSM)?  If it is useful to us
> > and to others, we should look into helping maintain/support it.
> >
> >
> > On Jul 1, 2016 09:37, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Schuyler Earl. Good luck.  It's like 12 projects ago for him.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Do we know who was running geocoder.us?  Maybe we could get it fixed.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Jul 1, 2016 05:03, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey Folks,
> >> >>
> >> >> geocoder.us appears to be defunct. The website doesn't load and
> there
> >> >> certainly does not appear to be any geocodes being returned.  This
> was
> >> >> our default geocoder.
> >> >>
> >> >> The other geocoder with which we have code is the Google Geocoder.
> >> >> I'm fixing it up right now to work (it wasn't) and to also include an
> >> >> appropriate credit/disclaimer.  However, I'm a bit worried as we are
> >> >> probably running afoul the Google TOS.  I see a few options:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Run with it. We're a very small fish in a very large pond.
> >> >> 2. Do not include a Geocoder by default but provide instructions for
> >> >> adding back in the Google geocoder (including setting an API key).
> >> >> This runs ... "less" afoul the TOS depending on how you read them.
> >> >> 3. Remove all the geocoders.  They're all broken.  Folks may not like
> >> >> to see the code disappear.
> >> >>
> >> >> Long term (and I will file a ticket to this regard) we should
> probably
> >> >> write our own Geocoder instructions or write a crappy
> >> >> DIY/off-the-shelf-libs geocoder that works with the default parcel
> >> >> data.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >>
> >> >> -Duck
> >> >>
> >> >> Reference tickets:
> >> >> - https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/issues/150
> >> >> - https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/issues/152
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> geomoose-psc mailing list
> >> >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20160701/11bcd1a3/attachment.html>


More information about the geomoose-psc mailing list