[geomoose-psc] PSC meeting - late January 2021 ??

[TC Haddad]

I had just assumed IRC, but would be fine with JITSI too. Notes might be
slightly easier to do with IRC...

More important is the agenda though, and I had been meaning to prompt on
that this week.

Rough outline held over from last time:

   - 2021 budget,
   - progress report / next steps on editing RFC
   - other 2021 plans in general
   - follow on the Travis topic (if any is needed)

But obviously anything else can be on the list too, within reason.

T

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:07 PM Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm in favor of meetings having agendas.
>
> I don't have strong feelings about how we meet.
>
> IRC certainly has some advantages (public, easy logs/minutes,
> multitasking), and some drawbacks (multitasking, less human interaction).
>
> If we do a video/voice conference thing, I'd suggest Jitsi over Zoom just
> staying in the spirit of FLOSS.  We've been using it successfully for our
> monthly Twin Cities Mapserver Users Group (TCMUG) meetings since meeting in
> person became problematic last year.
>
> I think the best way to have a meeting is in person, somewhere outside
> with good weather - maybe on boat, and a good beverage in hand.  But given
> the current global situation, I'll settle for the beverage.
>
> On 2/1/21 12:45 PM, Brian Fischer wrote:
>
> I can do any of those ideas.
>
>
>   *Brian Fischer *
> Project Manager - GIS | Vice President
> Houston Engineering, Inc.
> *O* 763.493.4522 | *D* 763.493.6664 | *C *763.229.2734
>    7550 Meridian Circle North, Suite 120
> Maple Grove, MN • 55369
> *www.houstoneng.com* <http://www.houstoneng.com/>
> Follow us: Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/houstoneng> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/houstoneng> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/houston-engineering-inc.> | YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/HoustonEngInc>
>
> This entire message (including all forwards and replies) and any
> attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret, work-product,
> attorney-client or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* geomoose-psc <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
> <geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *On Behalf Of *Eli Adam
> *Sent:* Monday, February 1, 2021 12:14 PM
> *To:* Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* GeoMOOSE PSC <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> <geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [geomoose-psc] PSC meeting - late January 2021 ??
>
>
>
> *[External Email]*
> ------------------------------
>
> Do we want to go over that last agenda and notes to include parts we
> didn't get to for this meeting?  Having an agenda and dedicated focus might
> make for a more productive meeting.  Do we want to consider getting crazy
> and trying phone, zoom, or something like that?  What do people think for
> the best way to have a meeting?
>
>
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 7:27 PM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you for arranging this!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:05 PM Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 1/26/21 12:24 PM, TC Haddad wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Looks like most folks have responded and next Friday February 5th from
> 12-2pm Pacific seems to be the clear winner.
>
>
>
> Please hold that on your calendars, and see you on IRC next week!
>
>
>
> T
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:00 AM Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> This is great! Thanks for putting together the Doodle!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:56 AM TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Happy New Year all,
>
>
>
> I had a dim memory that we said we would try for another PSC meeting at
> the end of January, and somehow, here we are. If we want to stick to that
> plan, I've put together a Doodle that spans Tuesday the 26th to Friday the
> 5th:
>
>
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/ivbe69be3ufiw94c
>
>
>
> As a refresher, the minutes of the last meeting are here:
>
> https://github.com/geomoose/geomoose/wiki/PSC-Meeting-2020-11-23
>
>
>
> NO worries if the timing is not right, I just wanted to prompt, and if
> there is a better plan we can definitely do something else,
>
>
>
> Hope 2021 is treating you well thus far!
>
>
>
> Tanya
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> geomoose-psc mailing list
>
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing listgeomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20210202/c1b21d38/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hei_d562a228-8e53-424d-8c69-43b1a222b74e.png
Type: image/png
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20210202/c1b21d38/attachment-0001.png>