<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div>Should we add a "sphinx-docs/source/LICENSE.rst" page to clarify?</div><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; "> <div style="font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; "> <div dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Eli Adam <eadam@co.lincoln.or.us><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> "geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org" <geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:33 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [geomoose-psc] Fwd: Motion: expand existing license
to cover all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)<br> </font> </div> <br>
With +1 from JimK, Bobb, Brent, Brian, Dan and me, the motion to<br>extend our existing license to all otherwise unspecified contents of<br>svn passes. This includes the sphinx docs and excludes any external<br>libraries.<br><br>This is already largely implied with,<br>http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/browser/geomoose2/trunk/LICENSE<br><br>However, I've now updated the bottom line on our webpage, to directly<br>state that, http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/changeset/916/<br><br>Eli<br><br>On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Dan Little <<a ymailto="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com" href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Thought I was subscribed but looks like I created an account but never<br>> actually activated the account. (I used the admin panel.)<br>><br>> I'm fine with +1'ing this. The docs, IMO, are valuable to us and not others<br>> so I don't think a CC by SA or other such license will
provide much benefit.<br>> Also, if something in our docs are valuable to others than adding to the<br>> global mind-share in a free (as in speech) is more inline with my thinking<br>> anyway.<br>><br>> ________________________________<br>> From: Eli Adam <<a ymailto="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us" href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>><br>> To: Brent Fraser <<a ymailto="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com" href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>>; Brian Fischer<br>> <<a ymailto="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com" href="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com">bfischer@houstoneng.com</a>>; <a ymailto="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com" href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a><br>> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:11 PM<br>> Subject: Fwd: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover all<br>> unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation
included)<br>><br>> If you guys have not already signed up for the psc email list, please do so.<br>><br>> Thanks, Eli<br>><br>><br>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>> From: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <<a ymailto="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us" href="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us">bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>><br>> Date: Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:25 AM<br>> Subject: RE: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover<br>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)<br>> To: "<a ymailto="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us" href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>" <<a ymailto="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us" href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>>,<br>> "<a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org" href="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@osgeo.org</a>" <<a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org"
href="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@osgeo.org</a>><br>><br>><br>> +1<br>><br>> Bobb<br>><br>><br>><br>>>> -----Original Message-----<br>>>> From: <a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" href="mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces@lists.osgeo.org">geomoose-psc-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a> [mailto:geomoose-psc-<br>>>> <a ymailto="mailto:bounces@lists.osgeo.org" href="mailto:bounces@lists.osgeo.org">bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a>] On Behalf Of Eli Adam<br>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 5:57 PM<br>>>> To: <a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org" href="mailto:geomoose-psc@osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@osgeo.org</a><br>>>> Subject: [geomoose-psc] Motion: expand existing license to cover<br>>>> all unspecified contents of geomoose SVN (documentation included)<br>>>><br>>>> On the to-do
list for incubation is to directly state a<br>>>> documentation license. At the last PSC meeting, those present<br>>>> were in favor of extending our existing license to all svn<br>>>> contents (unless noted otherwise with their own included licenses<br>>>> like included libraries).<br>>>><br>>>> This does not apply to included libraries and other files that<br>>>> may already have a license header.<br>>>> This does cover all the sphinx documentation.<br>>>> The motion will be open for voting for two full business days.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Motion to extend our existing license,<br>>>> http://www.geomoose.org/info/license.html, to cover all otherwise<br>>>> unspecified contents of GeoMOOSE svn.<br>>>><br>>>> I'll start
voting:<br>>>> +1 Eli<br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list<br>>>> <a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org" href="mailto:geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc<br>><br>><br>_______________________________________________<br>geomoose-psc mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org" href="mailto:geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>