Bob,<br><br>Bringing this thread back to life after the meeting. <br><br>From the meeting it sounds that people generally <span class="il">support</span>
this concept. Jim brought up good points about keeping
rights-encumbered logos out of svn with which I agree. We could
probably link to the logos rather than put them in svn or otherwise come
up with something to achieve these requirements. <br>
<br>So for something to actually happen, I think someone needs to make changes/proposed changes to <a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/browser/geomoose2/trunk/sphinx-docs/source/" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/browser/geomoose2/trunk/sphinx-docs/source/</a>
Since you seem the most interested in this, I suggest that you lead the
effort (no one else seems interested enough to actually do the work).
If you need help setting up a sphinx environment (on Windows or linux)
or help with valid sphinx syntax, I can help you with that. <div class="yj6qo ajU"><div id=":4kn" class="ajR" tabindex="0"><img class="ajT" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/images/cleardot.gif"></div></div><div class="adL">
<br></div><span class="HOEnZb adL"><font color="#888888">
<br>Eli</font></span><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us" target="_blank">bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Oh yeah, forgot all about that. :c)<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
Bobb<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: Eli Adam [mailto:<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>]<br>
</div><div class="im HOEnZb">>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:33 PM<br>
>> To: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">>> Cc: Brian Fischer; Dan Little; Brent Fraser; Jim Klassen<br>
>> Subject: Re: Moving "Support" link to a more prominent spot on<br>
>> the GeoMoose Home page.<br>
>><br>
>> Please consider subscribing to and using,<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc</a><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us">bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > All,<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I was supposed to start this thread earlier than this after the<br>
>> PSC meeting, sorry.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > So, a couple of points to discuss/vote on:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > ** Adding a "Support" link to a more prominent location on the<br>
>> home<br>
>> > page. I propose adding into the top link bar, possibly after<br>
>> the<br>
>> > "Developers"?? link. This would link to the existing page:<br>
>> > <a href="http://www.geomoose.org/info/commercial_support.html" target="_blank">http://www.geomoose.org/info/commercial_support.html</a><br>
>><br>
>> I support more prominent 'support'. I have a knee jerk reaction<br>
>> against adding to the top link bar but will raise no objection in<br>
>> this case.<br>
>><br>
>> +1 Eli<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> > ** Second, I would like to optionally add in the logos for each<br>
>> of the companies listed.<br>
>><br>
>> +1 Eli (some reasonable 1"-1.5" tall logo preferably coordinated<br>
>> and<br>
>> placed by one person so that it looks nice and not disjointed).<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> > There didn't seem to be any dissension froim the group at the<br>
>> meeting about these items.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > We did discuss a little bit about trying to figure out some<br>
>> sort of certification process to apply to the list, but I don't<br>
>> believe we have a viable method for applying something like this<br>
>> right now.<br>
>><br>
>> If it arises that people/companies with no GeoMoose relation are<br>
>> wanting to fill this area, we can add some rule like: must<br>
>> correctly resolve 10 issues on the email list every year to get<br>
>> listed. Tickets with patches that are applied can count at 1<br>
>> issue per 10 lines of code. I don't anticipate problems. If<br>
>> they arise, we'll deal with it. In my mind, support on the GM<br>
>> site is for companies that are making a noticeable positive<br>
>> contribution to GM.<br>
>><br>
>> I don't think that there are any restrictions on registering<br>
>> here, <a href="http://www.osgeo.org/search_profile" target="_blank">http://www.osgeo.org/search_profile</a>, and those not making a<br>
>> noticeable positive contribution to GM are free to do so.<br>
>><br>
>> Eli<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Thoughts?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Bobb<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> >>> From: Eli Adam [mailto:<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>]<br>
>> >>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:21 PM<br>
>> >>> To: Brian Fischer<br>
>> >>> Cc: Dan Little; Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul); Brent Fraser; Jim<br>
>> >>> Klassen<br>
>> >>> Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday,<br>
>> Sept.14th 10-<br>
>> >>> 2 - Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Ok, coming up on this soon.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> This looks to be the to-do list:<br>
>> >>> 1. Determine connectivity/communication method for Brent and<br>
>> I 2.<br>
>> >>> Announce meeting on list (people can ask for directions if<br>
>> >>> attending in person or connectivity if remote) 3. Review and<br>
>> update<br>
>> >>><br>
>> <a href="http://geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Planning_Me" target="_blank">http://geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Planning_Me</a><br>
>> >>> eting<br>
>> >>> 4. Anything else?<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Please spend time thinking about everything on the agenda to<br>
>> >>> maximize productivity while we are together<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> (Bob, should incubation be on the agenda?)<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Please add in anything I left out.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Eli<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Brian Fischer<br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com">bfischer@houstoneng.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >>> > I'm assuming you are referring to FOSS4G-NA next May? If<br>
>> so I<br>
>> >>> would > say that fits under the "promotion" item and would<br>
>> be lower<br>
>> >>> priority > discussion than other things at this meeting.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > The format for the FOSS4G-NA conference has not been set<br>
>> in<br>
>> >>> stone yet, > for example we still don't know if we are going<br>
>> to<br>
>> >>> have workshops at FOSS4G-NA<br>
>> >>> > yet. All we know is the date and place for now. I'm on<br>
>> the<br>
>> >>> planning<br>
>> >>> > committee so I can keep the group informed on<br>
>> opportunities to<br>
>> >>> promote > GeoMoose.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >>> From: Dan Little [mailto:<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>] > Sent:<br>
>> Thursday,<br>
>> >>> August 23, 2012 9:03 AM > To: Brian Fischer; Basques, Bob<br>
>> >>> (CI-StPaul); <a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>; > Brent Fraser > ><br>
>> > Cc:<br>
>> >>> Jim Klassen > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting -<br>
>> Friday,<br>
>> >>> Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Would FOSS4G plans be for this meeting or is that a better<br>
>> >>> discussion > item for other times (August / October)?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > ________________________________<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > From: Brian Fischer <<a href="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com">bfischer@houstoneng.com</a>> > To: Dan<br>
>> Little<br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>>; "Basques, Bob (CI- StPaul)"<br>
>> >>> > <<a href="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us">bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>>; "<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>"<br>
>> >>> > <<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>>; Brent Fraser<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>><br>
>> >>> > Cc: Jim Klassen <<a href="mailto:klassen.js@gmail.com">klassen.js@gmail.com</a>> > Sent: Thursday,<br>
>> August<br>
>> >>> 23, 2012 8:38 AM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting<br>
>> -<br>
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Ok, started a wiki page.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>><br>
>> <a href="http://www.geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Plannin" target="_blank">http://www.geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Plannin</a><br>
>> >>> g_Mee<br>
>> >>> > ting Please add to it. I tried to list items in order of<br>
>> >>> importance > for discussion purposes.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > ><br>
>> ><br>
>> >>> From: Dan Little [mailto:<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>] > Sent:<br>
>> Wednesday,<br>
>> >>> August 22, 2012 1:07 PM > To: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul);<br>
>> Brian<br>
>> >>> Fischer; <a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>; > Brent Fraser > Cc: Jim<br>
>> Klassen<br>
>> >>> > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday,<br>
>> Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Another discussion item:<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Modernizing the Demo.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > a. Integrated Search<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > b. More useful demonstration of default services.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > c. Integrating table-based results from things like<br>
>> Select.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > ________________________________<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > From: "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)"<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us">bob.basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>> ><br>
>> >>> To: Dan Little <<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>>; Brian Fischer ><br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com">bfischer@houstoneng.com</a>>; "<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>"<br>
>> >>> > <<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>>; Brent Fraser<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>><br>
>> >>> > Cc: Jim Klassen <<a href="mailto:klassen.js@gmail.com">klassen.js@gmail.com</a>> > Sent: Wednesday,<br>
>> August<br>
>> >>> 22, 2012 12:39 PM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap<br>
>> Meeting -<br>
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > All,<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Not really a Coding roadmap item, but I would like to<br>
>> enhance<br>
>> >>> the > visibility of "support" resources for GeoMoose, and<br>
>> I'm<br>
>> >>> willing to > take on this aspect roadmap wise and include<br>
>> this as<br>
>> >>> a discussion item.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Bobb<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > From: Dan Little [mailto:<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>] > Sent:<br>
>> Wednesday,<br>
>> >>> August 22, 2012 12:29 PM > To: Brian Fischer;<br>
>> >>> <a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>; Brent Fraser > Cc: Jim Klassen;<br>
>> Basques,<br>
>> >>> Bob (CI-StPaul) > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting<br>
>> -<br>
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > PSC Meeting Rules:<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Rule I: No coding.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Otherwise, yes, we should start an outline of discussion<br>
>> items.<br>
>> >>> Some<br>
>> >>> > thoughts of mine:<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > 1. Establish a policy on underlaying library upgrades. We<br>
>> >>> should have > an understanding and publish that to the user<br>
>> base.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > 2. Library Upgrades:<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > a. OpenLayers (latest Stable)<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > b. Dojo (1.8 / latest Stable)<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > 3. Extensions, documentation of extensions, and philosophy<br>
>> on<br>
>> >>> deploy > strategies. I know what JimK is doing but it may<br>
>> not be<br>
>> >>> appropriate > for our userbase at-large.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > ________________________________<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > From: Brian Fischer <<a href="mailto:bfischer@houstoneng.com">bfischer@houstoneng.com</a>> > To:<br>
>> >>> "<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>" <<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>>; Brent<br>
>> Fraser ><br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>> > Cc: Dan Little<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:danlittle@yahoo.com">danlittle@yahoo.com</a>>;<br>
>> >>> Jim Klassen > <<a href="mailto:klassen.js@gmail.com">klassen.js@gmail.com</a>>; Bob Basques<br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:Bob.Basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us">Bob.Basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us</a>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22,<br>
>> 2012<br>
>> >>> 12:15 PM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting -<br>
>> Friday,<br>
>> >>> Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Would it make sense to start a wiki page for the roadmap<br>
>> meeting<br>
>> >>> > agenda? If so I can start a page. I have a feeling we are<br>
>> going<br>
>> >>> to > have more content to discuss than 4 hours will allow us<br>
>> to,<br>
>> >>> but at > least we will have all the ideas down and can<br>
>> prioritize<br>
>> >>> them for discussion purposes.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > If we have a wiki page, at least I can put my thoughts<br>
>> somewhere<br>
>> >>> > before I lose them. Which seems to happen often ;-) > ><br>
>> Brian<br>
>> >>> Fischer, CFM > Principal | GIS Project Manager > Houston<br>
>> >>> Engineering, Inc.<br>
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > ><br>
>> >>> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Fischer > Sent:<br>
>> Monday,<br>
>> >>> August 20, 2012 3:39 PM > To: '<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>';<br>
>> Brent<br>
>> >>> Fraser > Cc: Dan Little; Jim Klassen; Bob Basques ><br>
>> Subject: RE:<br>
>> >>> GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday, Sept.14th<br>
>> >>> 10-2 -<br>
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Dan, Bob and Jim - I can host at our office if you all<br>
>> want to<br>
>> >>> drive > to Maple Grove. I could setup a conference call<br>
>> line and<br>
>> >>> TeamViewer > web meeting for video. Might even be able to<br>
>> convince<br>
>> >>> Houston to by > us lunch > :-) > > Is anyone opposed if<br>
>> I<br>
>> >>> invite Andrew Sheppard to the meeting as well, > even<br>
>> though he<br>
>> >>> isn't on the PSC? He could speak much better about the ><br>
>> >>> technical design issues he faced rather than you all hearing<br>
>> it<br>
>> >>> second had from me.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Thanks for organizing this Eli!<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM<br>
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager<br>
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.<br>
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > ><br>
>> >>> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Adam<br>
>> >>> [mailto:<a href="mailto:eadam@co.lincoln.or.us">eadam@co.lincoln.or.us</a>] > Sent: Monday, August 20,<br>
>> 2012<br>
>> >>> 3:10 PM > To: Brent Fraser > Cc: Dan Little; Jim Klassen;<br>
>> Brian<br>
>> >>> Fischer; Bob Basques > Subject: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting<br>
>> -<br>
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th 10-2<br>
>> >>> - Date,<br>
>> >>> > time, place?, connectivity?<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > All,<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > We now have our date and time (I think we have the time)!<br>
>> >>> Friday,<br>
>> >>> > September 14, 2012 12-4 (MN Time) I have gotten confused<br>
>> on the<br>
>> >>> time > zones. If it was not 12-4 Central, let me know the<br>
>> time<br>
>> >>> that it was supposed to be.<br>
>> >>> > Otherwise, meeting starts at,<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>><br>
>> <a href="http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=20" target="_blank">http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=20</a><br>
>> >>> 12&mo<br>
>> >>> > nth=9&day=14&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=219&p2=202&p3=55<br>
>> >>> > and lasts 4 hours.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > I'll let the locals determine the place as well as some<br>
>> audio<br>
>> >>> and > perhaps visual connectivity options for Brent and I<br>
>> (more<br>
>> >>> below). As > a virtual attendee, I have some preference for<br>
>> a<br>
>> >>> location with > reliable and plentiful connectivity (i.e.<br>
>> somewhat<br>
>> >>> opposed to coffee > shop on the corner with intermittent<br>
>> and/or<br>
>> >>> slow connection).<br>
>> >>> If I<br>
>> >>> > were there, I would suggest starting with an early lunch<br>
>> >>> somewhere > nearby at 11 (or ordering pizza to arrive at<br>
>> 11:30).<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Brent Fraser ><br>
>> >>> <<a href="mailto:bfraser@geoanalytic.com">bfraser@geoanalytic.com</a>> > wrote:<br>
>> >>> >> I can only attend virtually, so I'm flexible. An<br>
>> thoughts on<br>
>> >>> the >> virtual tech (Skype?, Google video chat?, other?) ><br>
>> > I'm<br>
>> >>> also attending virtually. Dan and Brian offered WebEx or<br>
>> similar<br>
>> >>> > type things which includes sound, visual, and text. The<br>
>> main ><br>
>> >>> interaction at the meeting will be audio and some visual<br>
>> since most<br>
>> >>> > people will be there in person. I don't think that I have<br>
>> a ><br>
>> >>> preference for anything specific except that it should<br>
>> include at<br>
>> >>> > least audio and hopefully be easy to hear and speak. I<br>
>> think<br>
>> >>> that > I'll defer to whoever is supporting it on the other<br>
>> end as<br>
>> >>> to > specifics. Brent, if you have a specific preference,<br>
>> let<br>
>> >>> whoever is supporting it know.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Once the meeting location and connectivity is determined,<br>
>> we can<br>
>> >>> > announce on the list and people can request connectivity<br>
>> details<br>
>> >>> or > directions if they are inclined.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > At the August 30th PSC meeting, we can work on an agenda<br>
>> for the<br>
>> >>> > RoadMap Meeting as well as approaches to those RoadMap<br>
>> agenda<br>
>> >>> items in > addition to our other PSC meeting work. Below is<br>
>> what I<br>
>> >>> had put > together previously for the RoadMap but it need<br>
>> more and<br>
>> >>> specifics.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > At the PSC monthly meeting, we raised a few things which<br>
>> need<br>
>> >>> further > discussion and decision. Things like: build system<br>
>> type<br>
>> >>> and necessity, > how extensions are done, upgrade to Dojo<br>
>> 1.7 and<br>
>> >>> AMD-style class > definitions, versioning, test suite,<br>
>> additional<br>
>> >>> configuration > parameters, selection interaction, etc. Also<br>
>> >>> perhaps review some of > the decisions and good progress<br>
>> we've<br>
>> >>> made since the F2F at FOSS4G 2011.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > This will be a ~4 hour meeting.<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> > Later, Eli<br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> >>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>