<div>
Sweet, I will pass that along.
</div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Wednesday, 27 March 2013 at 4:41 PM, James Klassen wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><p dir="ltr">They are applied as of yesterday afternoon (US). Changes should be in the website by now.</p>
<div>On Mar 27, 2013 1:27 AM, "Jody Garnett" <<a href="mailto:jody.garnett@gmail.com">jody.garnett@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div>
So I am holding the "motion" for GeoMoose to graduate open another week (rather than letting it stall) in the hopes of seeing ticket #<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/ticket/179" style="color:rgb(0,106,227)" target="_blank">179</a>and #<a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/ticket/180%20" style="color:rgb(0,106,227)" target="_blank">180</a> closed off.</div>
<div>Thus far there has a been a bit of grumbling (but no show stoppers) over the license being hard to follow, suppose it was hard to write so it should be hard to follow?</div><div><br></div><div>What would it take to get the patches for #179 and #180 applied?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
geomoose-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org">geomoose-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div>
</div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>