[Geomoose-users] Recommended MS4W/GeoMoose version?

[TC Haddad]

+1

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:

I think a 2.4.1 with the main.js:501 comma fix and the MS 6 fixes would be
> a good plan.  Even after 2.6 some people may want to continue to run a 2.4
> series.
>
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 15:15, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
> > Until we get the next release (2.6) out, do we have a recommended MS4W
> > and GeoMoose version combination?
> >
> > Although I've only done limited testing, it seems that the most recent
> > MS4W (3.0.3) with GeoMoose 2.4 with a few changes is the best bet.
> >
> > The changes needed to GeoMoose 2.4 that I have noted so far are:
> >
> > -PHP: layerObj->getFeature() is gone, use layerObj->getShape() instead.
> > -geomoose_globals.map: GD/JPEG driver is gone, use AGG/JPEG.
> >                      Default to PNG not GIF.
> > -symbol.sym: Comment out GAP and STYLE as they have moved into the STYLE
> >            stanza in the mapfile from the SYMBOL definition.
> > (All done in trunk with revision 468)
> > -And the trailing commas in main.js (501) and compiled.js (2216)
> >
> > Other changes?
> >
> > Should we consider a 2.4.1 release with these changes or just focus on
> 2.6?
> >
> > Bests, Eli
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geomoose-users mailing list
> > Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20111122/a6398ba1/attachment.html