[Geomoose-users] RFC-2, motion

[Dan Little]

+1




>________________________________
> From: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
>To: "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>; James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> 
>Cc: Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>; "geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org" <geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:10 AM
>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] RFC-2, motion
> 
>
> 
>+1 for me.
> 
>Brian Fischer, CFM
>GIS Manager 
>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
> 
>From:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
>Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 11:52 PM
>To: James Klassen
>Cc: Bob Basques; geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] RFC-2, motion
> 
>Jim and Bob, 
>On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:37 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:
>Actually, in that light it might just be cleaner to strike the "similar to MapServer's" line.  MapServer doesn't really justify why we need a mission statement.
> 
>
>Good idea.  I removed that.
> 
> 
>>On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>>Eli, 
>> 
>>The only comment I have a couple of slight comments, about the reference to MapServer.   Seems like this is out of place in here for some reason.  Maybe expanding that comment to include the other open source projects that are included and how they might be similarly administered.  the refence to ". . . the website as a representation . . .", might this be better with a link to the actual website (due to possible replication of the page?), to something like " . . . . the website (geomoose.org) as a representation . . ." 
>> 
>
>Good point, I added a link.  If the changes aren't visible on the website, both are here,
http://trac.osgeo.org/geomoose/changeset/763/
>
>I also changed the status to proposed.  I'll start the voting on the motion:
>
>+1
>
>Eli
>
> 
>bobb 
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>>All,
>>>
>>>    RFC-2 is available for review.  Voice your thoughts in the next
>>>few days.  I'll change the status to proposed and call for a vote next
>>>week.
>>>
>>>http://geomoose.org/trunk/rfc/rfc-2.html
>>>
>>>Regards, Eli
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Geomoose-users mailing list
>>>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users 
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Geomoose-users mailing list
>>>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>> 
> 
>_______________________________________________
>Geomoose-users mailing list
>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120424/3fa43194/attachment-0001.html