[Geomoose-users] documentation ideas

[Dan Little]

Yeah, I'd just drop the Dojo/Openlayers from the diagram... it doesn't
really seem to fit what is being shown.  Otherwise I think it looks great!
(Oh, the "Clients" typically talk to web server software like Apache,
Nginx, or IIS)

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:

> Like so:
>
>
> The “Direct Links” was sort of trying to tell the story of a Standalone
> install mechanism.  Maybe too subtle though.  :c)
>
> bobb
>
>
>
> On Dec 22, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Welll.... sorta.  I think that greying them out and putting them there
> makes them subtle enough.
>
> Technically "Services" should be it's own thing, with "PHP" under it.  And
> the Template Files under that.  Not sure what you're trying to get with
> "Direct Links" other than trying to configure the links bar.
>
>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20151222/cb93f073/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GeoMOOSE Components03.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43295 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20151222/cb93f073/attachment-0001.png>