<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hello all,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal> I sent out a sample demo to some of
our web app. users this morning. I’m starting to get some feedback
from our users as they test it out. If you’re interested I will
keep you updated on additional feedback from our sample group. Initially
the main concern so far has been speed. It appears most of our users are
seeing about a 5-10 second redraw speed depending on which and how many layers
they have loaded. This will probably be deemed unacceptable to most of
our users seeing our current application redraws in less than 2 seconds with
most layers. I know we have discussed tiling layers, which I’m not
currently doing, but how much faster will my application run if I tile our
larger files like the aerial, parcels, and utility files? Is it worth
exploring tiling all these layers? Are most Moose users seeing faster
redraw speeds?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Adam M. Feidt<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GIS Coordinator<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>City of Eden Prairie<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>8080 Mitchell Rd<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Eden Prairie, MN 55344<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>phone# 952-949-8443<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>fax# 952-949-8334<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>