<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div><span>Jim and I are working on a plan for a 2.4.1 release. The main.js fix and the MS6.0.1 fixes. We're working on scheduling more than anything else.</span></div><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; "> <div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; "> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Bob Basques <Bob.Basques@ci.stpaul.mn.us><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Eli Adam <eadam@co.lincoln.or.us>; Jim Klassen <klassen.js@gmail.com> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> "geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org"
<geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, November 23, 2011 9:09 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [Geomoose-users] Recommended MS4W/GeoMoose version?<br> </font> <br>
<div id="yiv187767744">
<div>
<div style="margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;">
<font size="3" face="Comic Sans MS">All,</font> </div>
<br>
<div style="margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;">
<font size="3" face="Comic Sans MS">Related to these types of fixes. Would it be wise to in general, to always have at least two stable versions of major releases in maintenance mode. Once a new major version comes out, the oldest in the history goes into non-auto upgrade/fix status. This wouldn't need to preclude some person / organization from enhancing an older version if they chose to pay for it.</font> </div>
<br> <br>
<div style="margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;">
<font size="3" face="Comic Sans MS">bobb</font> </div>
<br> <br>
<div style="margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;">
<br>
<br>
>>> Jim Klassen <klassen.js@gmail.com> wrote:<br> </div>
<table border="0" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;margin-left:15px;font-size:1em;margin-right:0;" bgcolor="#f3f3f3">
<tbody><tr>
<td>
<div style="padding-left:7px;border-left:solid 1px #050505;">
<div style="margin-bottom:0;margin-top:0;">
I think a 2.4.1 with the main.js:501 comma fix and the MS 6 fixes would be a good plan. Even after 2.6 some people may want to continue to run a 2.4 series.<br><br>On Nov 22, 2011, at 15:15, Eli Adam <eadam@co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:<br><br>> Until we get the next release (2.6) out, do we have a recommended MS4W<br>> and GeoMoose version combination?<br>><br>> Although I've only done limited testing, it seems that the most recent<br>> MS4W (3.0.3) with GeoMoose 2.4 with a few changes is the best bet.<br>><br>> The changes needed to GeoMoose 2.4 that I have noted so far are:<br>><br>> -PHP: layerObj->getFeature() is gone, use layerObj->getShape() instead.<br>> -geomoose_globals.map: GD/JPEG driver is gone, use AGG/JPEG.<br>> Default to PNG not GIF.<br>> -symbol.sym:
Comment out GAP and STYLE as they have moved into the STYLE<br>> stanza in the mapfile from the SYMBOL definition.<br>> (All done in trunk with revision 468)<br>> -And the trailing commas in main.js (501) and compiled.js (2216)<br>><br>> Other changes?<br>><br>> Should we consider a 2.4.1 release with these changes or just focus on 2.6?<br>><br>> Bests, Eli<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Geomoose-users mailing list<br>> Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org<br>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users<br>_______________________________________________<br>Geomoose-users mailing list<br>Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org<br><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Geomoose-users mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org" href="mailto:Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org">Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>