<div dir="auto">1) isn't a problem. You can configure other projections for user facing numbers like the coordinate display or the measure tool. The actual map and wms requests will still be in 3857.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2 and 3) Not sure what to tell you. If you really need caches then you may need to duplicate them in various projections.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">My experience at the county scale is I get good enough performance with MapServer serving what are basically cloud optimized GeoTIFFs over WMS to bother with caches. Then the clients can ask for whatever projection they want. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Supporting multiple projections from the WMS server has always been need for us because some people (CAD users) need to work in county coordinates (with a fake epsg code) instead of UTM.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 22, 2020, 14:40 Mark Volz <<a href="mailto:MarkVolz@co.lyon.mn.us">MarkVolz@co.lyon.mn.us</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="m_9040272368149692642WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It is my understanding that GeoMOOSE 3.x works best with EPSG 3857 (Web Mercator). I understand Web Mercator is great when users want to combine backgrounds from multiple sources. However, I would like to still use my county projection
for several reasons.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="m_9040272368149692642MsoListParagraph"><u></u><span>1)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><u></u>Our users are expecting the X,Y coordinate display to be in county coordinates.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="m_9040272368149692642MsoListParagraph"><u></u><span>2)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><u></u>Our Air Photos are natively stored in county coordinates. Not needing to reproject our air photos improves performance when building a cache. I realize I could build our cache ahead of time, however I would rather build the cache on
the fly.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="m_9040272368149692642MsoListParagraph"><u></u><span>3)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span><u></u>We use our cache for several purposes. Other applications we have depend on air photos in county coordinates. I do not want to build two caches for both coordinate systems.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please let me know if it is possible to use a coordinate system other than 3857. If we can use our own coordinate system then is it more or less difficult to configure compared to the GeoMOOSE 3.x series?<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank You!<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d">Sincerely,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:#1f497d">Mark Volz, GISP</span></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Geomoose-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Geomoose-users@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users</a></blockquote></div>