[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

[Francesco Bartoli]

+1

  

Ciao

Francesco

> On Dec 2 2015, at 2:53 pm, Simone Dalmasso <simone.dalmasso at gmail.com>
wrote:  

>

> +1

>

>  

>

> 2015-12-02 13:04 GMT+01:00 Tom Kralidis
<[tomkralidis at gmail.com](mailto:tomkralidis at gmail.com)>:  

>

>>  
+1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the  
even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable release  
would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).  
  
Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?  
  
..Tom  
  
[1] <http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-
odd-strategy>  
  
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:  
  

>>

>>> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500  
From: Ariel Nunez
<[ingenieroariel at gmail.com](mailto:ingenieroariel at gmail.com)>  
To: Patrick Dufour
<[pjdufour.dev at gmail.com](mailto:pjdufour.dev at gmail.com)>  
Cc: geonode-devel <[geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org](mailto:geonode-
devel at lists.osgeo.org)>  
Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

>>>

>>>  
  
I believe this is a good idea too.  
  
-a  
  
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour
<[pjdufour.dev at gmail.com](mailto:pjdufour.dev at gmail.com)>  
wrote:  
  

>>>

>>>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have for  
2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and 2.5.  
  
I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,  
though.  My ideas might be out of date.  
  
Thanks!  
  
Regards,  
Patrick Dufour  

>>

>> _______________________________________________  
geonode-devel mailing list  
[geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org](mailto:geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org)  
<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel>  

>

>  
  

>

>  

>

> \--  

>

> Simone

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/485d7dfb/attachment.html>