[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

Ariel Nunez ingenieroariel at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 07:26:59 PST 2015


Patrick,

What I understood is that it means less alpha/beta/rc craze and just
knowing that the 2.5.x releases would be 'development' and should not be
used in production.

-a

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > By even/odd, do you mean bug fixes would be,
> >
> > 2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.4.5, 2.4.7, etc.
> >
> > And that the stable releases will be:
> >
> > 2.6.0, 2.8.0, 2.10.0, 2.12.0, etc.
> >
> > Or some other sequence.
> >
> > In regards, to the top number, I'd vote to stay on 2.x.x for a while and
> > only migrate to 3.x.x when there's a massive change.
> >
> > On Dec 2, 2015 9:57 AM, "Paolo Corti" <pcorti at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for even/odd and for 2.4.1 release
> >> cheers
> >> p
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alessio Fabiani
> >> <alessio.fabiani at geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> >> > It should not, the GeoServer version is the same train. There can be
> an
> >> > issue if the users run a "paver setup" command maybe, which (as far
> as I
> >> > remember) deletes the GeoServer Data Dir.
> >> >
> >> > ==
> >> > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> >> > http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
> >> > ==
> >> >
> >> > Ing. Alessio Fabiani
> >> > @alfa7691
> >> > Founder/Technical Lead
> >> >
> >> > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> >> > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> >> > 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> >> > Italy
> >> > phone: +39 0584 962313
> >> > fax:     +39 0584 1660272
> >> > mob:   +39 331 6233686
> >> >
> >> > http://www.geo-solutions.it
> >> > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> >> >
> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
> >> >
> >> > Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> >> > nel/i
> >> > file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro
> >> > utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
> per
> >> > le
> >> > finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> >> > messaggio
> >> > senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene
> >> > notizia
> >> > via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
> >> > cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> >> > divulgarlo
> >> > anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
> utilizzarlo
> >> > per
> >> > finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi
> >> > dettati
> >> > dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
> >> > for
> >> > the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be
> confidential
> >> > or
> >> > proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> >> > (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data
> Protection
> >> > Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure,
> >> > reproduction,
> >> > copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or
> partial,
> >> > is
> >> > strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> >> > addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> >> > immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> >> > information in this message that has been received in error. The
> sender
> >> > does
> >> > not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> >> > completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for
> changes
> >> > made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result
> of
> >> > e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.
> >> >>
> >> >> Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does
> not
> >> >> wipe out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have
> tested
> >> >> it
> >> >> with the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
> >> >> geoserver-geonode debian package.
> >> >>
> >> >> Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there
> seemed
> >> >> to
> >> >> be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received
> >> >> formal
> >> >> voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against it
> >> >> or
> >> >> support or should we do that in a github issue?
> >> >>
> >> >> -a
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in
> favor,
> >> >>> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
> >> >>> direction.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using
> the
> >> >>> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable
> >> >>> > release
> >> >>> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ..Tom
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > [1]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
> >> >>> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> >>> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> -a
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour
> >> >>> >> <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we
> >> >>> >>> have
> >> >>> >>> for
> >> >>> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4
> >> >>> >>> and
> >> >>> >>> 2.5.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code
> sprint,
> >> >>> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Thanks!
> >> >>> >>>
> >> >>> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> >>> Patrick Dufour
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >> >>> > geonode-devel mailing list
> >> >>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> geonode-devel mailing list
> >> >> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > geonode-devel mailing list
> >> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Paolo Corti
> >> Geospatial software developer
> >> web: http://www.paolocorti.net
> >> twitter: @capooti
> >> skype: capooti
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geonode-devel mailing list
> >> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geonode-devel mailing list
> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/f6cceba9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the geonode-devel mailing list