[geos-devel] GEOS Exceptions
artem at pavlenko.uklinux.net
Tue Apr 19 10:59:44 EDT 2005
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>On 4/19/05, Artem Pavlenko <artem at pavlenko.uklinux.net> wrote:
>>Agree, it is ambiguous, yet ISO-EBNF lists EMPTY as a special keyword.
>>Can anyone ask OGC folks?
>I have emailed David Arctur, who is now co-chair of the reformed
>Simple Features Revision Working Group - or so I have been told.
>My understanding is that the main RWG task is update the spec to
>include 2.5 geometries, and the new measure suggestions.
>I have asked him for the correct EMPTY handling interpretation,
>and encouraging his RWG to clarify this in the next generation of
>the specification as it is clearly confusing to quite alot of us.
More information about the geos-devel