[geos-devel] CVS GEOS union results

strk at refractions.net strk at refractions.net
Mon Jun 12 17:52:17 EDT 2006


>From which file from JTS did you extract the test ?
I haven't seen the geometries visually, did you ?
The default precision model is FLOATING (double), right,
but for XML tests the precision model can be specified
with the <precisionModel> tag.

--strk;

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:43:36PM -0500, Howard Butler wrote:
> According to the JTS Test builder the results of this union should be 
> as follows:
> 
> A
> --------------------------
> POLYGON ((601289.2369585614651442 4621930.3517169132828712, 
> 601296.6117308996617794 4621943.1251973006874323, 
> 601331.2527470423374325 4621943.1251973006874323, 
> 601348.5732551137916744 4621913.1251973006874323, 
> 601331.2527470423374325 4621883.1251973006874323, 
> 601296.6117308996617794 4621883.1251973006874323, 
> 601284.4943894973257557 4621904.1130482675507665, 
> 601277.1196171591291204 4621891.3395678801462054, 
> 601242.4786010164534673 4621891.3395678801462054, 
> 601225.1580929449992254 4621921.3395678801462054, 
> 601242.4786010164534673 4621951.3395678801462054, 
> 601244.3377801323076710 4621951.3395678801462054, 
> 601235.3788347869412974 4621966.8569164043292403, 
> 601252.6993428583955392 4621996.8569164043292403, 
> 601287.3403590010711923 4621996.8569164043292403, 
> 601304.6608670725254342 4621966.8569164043292403, 
> 601287.3403590010711923 4621936.8569164043292403, 
> 601285.4811798851005733 4621936.8569164043292403, 
> 601289.2369585614651442 4621930.3517169132828712))
> 
> B
> --------------------------
> POLYGON ((601289.3684807127574459 4621895.6708746394142509, 
> 601279.5020359900081530 4621895.4660383407026529, 
> 601284.4943894973257557 4621904.1130482675507665, 
> 601289.3684807127574459 4621895.6708746394142509))
> 
> Result
> --------------------------
> POLYGON ((601289.2369585615 4621930.351716913, 601296.6117308997 
> 4621943.125197301, 601331.2527470423 4621943.125197301, 
> 601348.5732551138 4621913.1251973, 601331.2527470423 
> 4621883.125197301, 601296.6117308997 4621883.125197301, 
> 601289.3684807126 4621895.67087464, 601279.5020359906 
> 4621895.466038343, 601277.1196171591 4621891.33956788, 
> 601242.4786010165 4621891.33956788, 601225.158092945 
> 4621921.33956788, 601242.4786010165 4621951.339567881, 
> 601244.3377801323 4621951.339567881, 601235.3788347867 
> 4621966.856916403, 601252.6993428584 4621996.856916403, 
> 601287.3403590011 4621996.856916403, 601304.6608670725 
> 4621966.856916403, 601287.3403590011 4621936.856916404, 
> 601285.4811798851 4621936.856916404, 601289.2369585615 4621930.351716913))
> 
> GEOS CVS HEAD is currently giving this as a result (using C++ API and 
> the default precision for the geometry factory... double, right?)
> 
> MULTIPOLYGON (((601289.2369585614651442 4621930.3517169132828712, 
> 601296.6117308996617794 4621943.1251973006874323, 
> 601331.2527470423374325 4621943.1251973006874323, 
> 601348.5732551137916744 4621913.1251973006874323, 
> 601331.2527470423374325 4621883.1251973006874323, 
> 601296.6117308996617794 4621883.1251973006874323, 
> 601284.4943894973257557 4621904.1130482675507665, 
> 601277.1196171591291204 4621891.3395678801462054, 
> 601242.4786010164534673 4621891.3395678801462054, 
> 601225.1580929449992254 4621921.3395678801462054, 
> 601242.4786010164534673 4621951.3395678801462054, 
> 601244.3377801323076710 4621951.3395678801462054, 
> 601235.3788347869412974 4621966.8569164043292403, 
> 601252.6993428583955392 4621996.8569164043292403, 
> 601287.3403590010711923 4621996.8569164043292403, 
> 601304.6608670725254342 4621966.8569164043292403, 
> 601287.3403590010711923 4621936.8569164043292403, 
> 601285.4811798851005733 4621936.8569164043292403, 
> 601289.2369585614651442 4621930.3517169132828712)), 
> ((601289.3684807127574459 4621895.6708746394142509, 
> 601279.5020359900081530 4621895.4660383407026529, 
> 601284.4943894973257557 4621904.1130482675507665, 
> 601289.3684807127574459 4621895.6708746394142509)))
> 
> Any ideas what might be going on?
> 
> Howard



More information about the geos-devel mailing list