[geos-devel] Petition for a 2.2.2 release

[Charlie Savage]

Actually, the bindings work on both 2.2.2 and 3.0.  The main difference 
is the renaming of a couple of classes, other than that the bindings 
just mirror whatever the C++ api is.

I'm fine either way on this, just thought it be nice to get out there 
for people to use.

Strk - any timeline on a 3.0 release?

And sorry, haven't looked at head yet...but will.

Charlie

Sean Gillies wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:07 AM, strk at refractions.net wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:35:48PM -0700, Charlie Savage wrote:
>>> Do we want to include the swig patches I have for 2.2.2?  Includes Ruby
>>> bindings, and more polished Python bindings.
>>
>> No problem for me. I'm pretty much assorbed in HEAD, and it might
>> come out not much later then 2.2.2.
>> BTW, class renames is finished, did you give HEAD a try with swig ?
>>
>> --strk;
>>
>
> Charlie, I feel that we shouldn't make significant changes like that 
> in a point release. Besides, isn't the SWIG API going to break from 
> 2.2 to 3.0? It doesn't make sense to me to release something that will 
> be immediately broken.
>
> Anything else I can do to get 2.2.2 out the door, Sandro?
>
> Sean
>
> ---
> Sean Gillies
> http://zcologia.com
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3166 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20060327/f2c0c984/smime.bin