Sorry for jumping in,<br><br>look also at Mike Toews thread on 7/10/2012, i think that we will not see full ZM support for some time ...<br>
<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mateusz Loskot <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mateusz@loskot.net" target="_blank">mateusz@loskot.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div>On 5 March 2013 19:53, Tyler Mitchell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Tyler.Mitchell@actian.com" target="_blank">Tyler.Mitchell@actian.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>What are GEOS users and devs doing to enable M measures in their GEOS-backed solutions? I won't worry about specialised functions at this point, but at least being able to reliably handle and maintain all XYZM ordinates is important for me. Is it such a lot of work that it's not worth adding this to GEOS? I saw a few messages in the archives looking at how to add measures but it wasn't encouraging ;)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Do you think GEOS will support all the SFSQL 1.2 types?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Tyler,</div><div><br>These two may be of interest</div><div>- interest sampling, no responses</div>
<div><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2011-December/005591.html" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2011-December/005591.html</a> <br></div><div>- more in-depth insights</div>
<div>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-July/005959.html" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-July/005959.html</a></div><div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div></div><div>Are people moving to Boost or CGAL instead?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>I don't see a wave of migration from one to another.</div><div>It all depends on many aspects, but code diversity is certainly a good thing.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div></div><span><font color="#888888">-- <br>Mateusz Loskot, <a href="http://mateusz.loskot.net" target="_blank">http://mateusz.loskot.net</a>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
geos-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>