<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Dan,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Well if you are going to fix it, less work for me to do nothing </span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Wingdings;color:#1F497D'>J</span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>So I’ll keep.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Thanks for confirming,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regina<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> geos-devel [mailto:geos-devel-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Daniel Baston<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 21, 2022 11:52 AM<br><b>To:</b> GEOS Development List <geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [geos-devel] GEOS 3.12 regression failure in PostGIS<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>It's not intentional. I will fix it in GEOS and add a test there. You might consider removing the PostGIS test because it's only testing GEOS behavior.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dan<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:35 AM Regina Obe <<a href="mailto:lr@pcorp.us">lr@pcorp.us</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=MsoNormal>Hi all,<br><br>PostGIS geos310 regression test, detailed here:<br><br><a href="https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5260" target="_blank">https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/5260</a><br><br>Started failing around October 18th.<br><br>The test is this:<br>SELECT '#168', ST_NPoints(g), ST_AsText(g), ST_isValidReason(g)<br>FROM ( VALUES<br>('01060000C00100000001030000C00100000003000000E3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F<br>4122ACEF440DAF9440FFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFE3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F4122ACEF440D<br>AF9440FFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFE3D9107E234F5041A3DB66BC97A30F4122ACEF440DAF9440FFFFFF<br>FFFFFFEFFF'::geometry)<br>) AS v(g);<br><br><br>I'm guessing might be caused by this commit -<br><a href="https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/32348a68c5212c89cfefab46891d2b3aada4ab40" target="_blank">https://github.com/libgeos/geos/commit/32348a68c5212c89cfefab46891d2b3aada4a<br>b40</a> <br>which happened around the same time tests started failing.<br><br>The difference from prior versions is that the 3.12 (main branch) now emits<br>for isValidReason one less coordinate<br><br>Too few points in geometry component[4275341.96977851 259186.966993061]<br><br>Instead of:<br>Too few points in geometry component[4275341.96977851 259186.966993061<br>1323.76295828331]<br><br><br>Which to me makes sense if we are only considering 2 dimensions for<br>validity.<br><br>Before I change the test, I want to confirm that this is an intentional<br>change.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Regina<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>geos-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div></body></html>