<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Le 02/11/12 21:07, Emmanuel Blondel a écrit :<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5093B76F.4090002@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Would you have some example with
ClassLoader that i could try to apply?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
No, I don't have an example yet... The idea is to use
URLClassLoader, since a class loaded by 2 different class loaders
are considered as 2 different classes by the JVM, even if they have
the same package and name.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5093B76F.4090002@gmail.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">The other alternative for me, maybe
would be to get the bounding box from WFS filtered layer, using
Geotoolkit and not Geotools/WFsDatastore.<br>
Would it be possible with Geotoolkit? In this case, it would
allow me do not depending anymore on gt-opengis.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
I think that Johann would know better than me on this one...<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5093B76F.4090002@gmail.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Otherwise, do you know what is the
status of what you precised below regarding Geotools? Do you
know if Geotools developers intend to change this, or not?<br>
Do you think would be good to copy as well to the geotools-dev
mailing list to get their feedback?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
They are aware of this issue, but I don't know what there intend is.
Understandably, they want to minimize the change for their users.
Nevertheless they are not allowed to use this namespace... If there
is a volunteer for bringing this issue on the GT mailing list, it
may be useful. But I prefer to not participate to this discussion
myself.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>