<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<p>Hello Juergen<br>
</p>
<p>Le 01/03/2021 à 12:48, juergen sorg a écrit :</p>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:70acf9bd-beae-8cc2-3345-c4dbb0333743@fz-juelich.de">
<p>thanks for your reply
</p>
<p>yes, we also use the Geotk CSW module.
</p>
<p>it would be nice if you could provide us with more details on
this migration procedure
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you were using only the metadata part, I would have suggested
to use the formal Apache SIS 1.0 release. But for the CSW part, we
are in an uncomfortable situation where we have snapshots deployed
every night, but no formal release. This is because we are
focusing all our deployment effort on Apache SIS, and Geotk (which
still contain CSW) became a temporary place for modules not yet
migrated to SIS. If you don't mind, I suggest to try snapshot for
starting. If it works, we can try to create a milestone, but it
would not be a formal release.</p>
<pre> <dependency>
<groupId>org.geotoolkit</groupId>
<artifactId>geotk-client-csw</artifactId>
<version>5.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
</pre>
<p>For the metadata part, it should be sufficient to replace the
following package names:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>org.geotoolkit.metadata
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>by:
</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>org.apache.sis.metadata
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Same for <font face="monospace">org.geotoolkit.referencing</font>,
which is replaced by <font face="monospace">org.apache.sis.referencing</font>.
Most classes in those packages are about the same.</p>
<p>For the CSW, I have been told that this module got a lot of
changes (it is maintained by another developer). I suggest that
you report the compiler errors, so we can tell the replacements.</p>
<p>Sorry for the inconvenience,</p>
<p> Martin</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>