[GRASS5] The status of 5.0

[Glynn Clements]

Bernhard Reiter wrote:

> On the merge:
> Glynn also posted a couple analysis of the differences of the 
> two branches in GRASS5. Glynn: Maybe you can propose how to completly
> discontinue the old release branch. You might also just do it if
> nobody else objects.

My preference would be to just sync any outstanding changes into the
trunk then declare the release branch to be dead (possibly renaming
the tag so that changes aren't committed to it inadvertently).

Modules which shouldn't be built due to outstanding bugs should just
be disabled in src/CMD/lists/GRASS, rather than actually omitting the
source code.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements at virgin.net>