[GRASS5] [bug #...

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Dec 2 05:30:56 EST 2004


On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:45:30PM +1300, Hamish wrote:
> > > Very good idea. I tried to clean up the buglist, but as it is now
> > > it's confusing and difficult. In fact, I would suggest:
> > > * 5.0 -> remove all (discontinued, unsupported)
> > 
> > It is better to document the bugs or ask people to try the next
> > version 5.4.0. After a grace period (say one month) closing can be
> > done without their reaction.
> 
> Can we resolve <=5.0 with a "won't fix" tag?

I would advise agaist it.
"Won't fix tags" are a red flag for me when it happens to me.

> (most open 5.0 bugs will hold for 5.4, so be careful with this..)

Yes, so a fix should be: Fixed in 5.4.x.
So maybe it should be avoided to have 5.0 specific bugs if possible.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20041202/4ceb9630/attachment.bin


More information about the grass-dev mailing list