[GRASS-dev] Re: v.generalize and interpolation, dmax problem

[Dylan Beaudette]

On Friday 17 August 2007 02:21, Paul Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Helena Mitasova wrote:
>
> [Interesting/impressive test results...]
>
> > which brings me to the main question - are there any objections to make
> > dmax default value
> > as large as the region to make sure that it does not add any points
> > (currently it is set to 1.25 resolution value which is obviously not
> > enough)? I have been trying to eliminate this parameter for years
> > as it usually causes more problems than it solves.
>
> For 7.x perhaps you could drop both the dmin and dmax parameters, and add
> a note to the man page suggesting that the user preprocess their contour
> data with v.generalize to resolve issues with closely-spaced points,
> before running v.surf.rst?
>
> Just a thought
>
> Paul

Helena:

Very interesting results- maybe consider writing this up in the OSGEO 
journal ?

I agree with Paul, as I have struggled and fussed with those two options for 
v.surf.rst for years.

Cheers,

Dylan


>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at grass.itc.it
> http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

-- 
Dylan Beaudette
Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group
University of California at Davis
530.754.7341