R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS5] r.li (landscape indices)

[serena]

sorry,
r.li.dominance          will be          r.li.dominance
r.li.meanPixelAttribute          will be          r.li.meanpa
r.li.patchnumber          will be          r.li.patchnum

also, because of the structure of r.li, I think is not a good idea to lump
different modules.

-serena-

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: serena [mailto:pallecch at cli.di.unipi.it]
Inviato: mercoledi 24 gennaio 2007 13.18
A: Markus Neteler
Cc: grass-dev at grass.itc.it
Oggetto: R: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS5] r.li (landscape indices)


hi all!

If there aren't problems I'll change r.li names. so:

r.li.contrastWeightedEdgeDensity	will be	r.li.cwed
r.li.dominance          will be          r.li.cwed
r.li.edgedensity           will be          r.li.edgedens
r.li.meanPatchSize          will be          r.li.meanps
r.li.meanPixelAttribute          will be          r.li.cwed
r.li.patchAreaDistributionCV          will be          r.li.padcv
r.li.patchAreaDistributionRANGE          will be          r.li.padrange
r.li.patchAreaDistributionSD          will be          r.li.padsd
r.li.patchdensity          will be          r.li.patchdens
r.li.patchnumber          will be          r.li.patchnm
r.li.richness          will be          r.li.richness
r.li.shannon          will be          r.li.shannon
r.li.shape          will be          r.li.shape
r.li.simpson          will be          r.li.simpson

-serena



-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Markus Neteler [mailto:neteler at itc.it]
Inviato: lunedi 22 gennaio 2007 22.24
A: pallecch at cli.di.unipi.it
Cc: grass-dev at grass.itc.it
Oggetto: Re: R: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS5] r.li (landscape indices)


Hi Serena,

before the too long r.li names start to be set in stone
(once folks start to write documentation, it becomes a pain
to rename modules, I suggest to urgently rename some
r.li modules.

I will do it soon - please let's finally agree on the names.
Also two descriptions are missing, see
raster/r.li/TODO

thanks,
Markus

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:36:19PM +0100, Maciej Sieczka wrote:
> pallecch at cli.di.unipi.it wrote:
> > hi, I'm thinking about the new names for r.li indexes
>
> I'd vote for shorter, mostly, but not to short. In detail:
>
> > r.li.shannon
> > r.li.simpson
> > r.li.edgedensity
>
> r.li.edgedens
>
> > r.li.contrastwed / r.li.cwed
>
> the latter
>
> > r.li.meanps / r.li.mps
>
> the former
>
> > r.li.padcv
> > r.li.meanpa / r.li.mpa
>
> the former
>
> > r.li.padsd
> > r.li.padrange / r.li.padrk
>
> the former
>
> > r.li.dominance
> > r.li.richness
> > r.li.patchdensity
>
> r.li.patchdens
>
> > r.li.shape
> > r.li.patchnumber
>
> r.li.patchnm
>
> Best,
> Maciek
>