[GRASS-dev] Re: iostream issues (formerly r.viewshed ready for testing)

[Will]

Hi Paul,

Yes, I am using the updated tarball that you sent me, and I'm getting the
same errors, regardless of if ami.h (the header for iostream) is included in
distribute.cc or not.

-Will

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Paul Kelly
<paul-grass at stjohnspoint.co.uk>wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Will wrote:
>
>  r.viewshed is a completely different issue.  It seems like it isn't able
>> to
>> see iostream at all - if I remove the include line for iostream, I get the
>> exact same errors.  I think this is probably because of the unusual
>> makefile
>> r.viewshed has.  We weren't able to get a makefile like r.terraflow to
>> work
>> with r.viewshed, so we more or less rewrote everything.  I'll try to mess
>> around with it, and make it use more standard grass makefiles rather than
>> rewriting them, but I'm not very familiar with how GRASS makes things, so
>> I
>> may not have much luck.  If you or anyone else could take a look at the
>> makefile, and try to make it more standard, I would appreciate it.
>>
>
> Hi Will,
> Did you use the updated tarball for r.viewshed that I sent you, with the
> Makefile adjusted and the include paths for the iostream includes changed to
> match the new location? If yes, and you are getting errors different from
> the ones I included in the previous mail, please post the output you are
> getting so we can diagnose.
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20080805/fb32a310/attachment.html